Denwiddie et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
| Monica Denwiddie and Lisa Leiberman |
| Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., Schnuck Markets, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson |
| 4:2019cv02652 |
| September 27, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| John M Bodenhausen |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 25 FULL CONSENT has been received by Plaintiffs Monica Denwiddie, Lisa Leiberman, Defendants Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., Schnuck Markets, Inc. (KEK) |
| Filing 24 REPLY to Response to Motion re #16 MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant Schnuck Markets, Inc.. (Rothermel, Stefani) |
| Filing 23 REPLY to Response to Motion re #12 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court to St. Louis City Circuit Court filed by Plaintiffs Monica Denwiddie, Lisa Leiberman. (Simon, Anthony) |
Filing 22
Docket Text ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion of defendants Johnson & Johnson and Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. for leave to file overlength memorandum #18 is GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Bodenhausen on 10/15/2019. (LXC)
|
| Filing 21 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #16 MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Plaintiffs Monica Denwiddie, Lisa Leiberman. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Simon, Anthony) |
| Filing 20 REPLY to Response to Motion re #6 MOTION to Stay all Proceedings filed by Defendants Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6)(Rankin, W.) |
| Filing 19 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #12 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court to St. Louis City Circuit Court filed by Defendants Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Rankin, W.) |
| Filing 18 MOTION for Leave to File in Excess of Page Limitation Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Motion to Remand by Defendants Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.. (Rankin, W.) |
| Filing 17 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #16 MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant Schnuck Markets, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Affidavit of Diana Cox)(Rothermel, Stefani) |
| Filing 16 MOTION to Dismiss Case by Defendant Schnuck Markets, Inc.. (Rothermel, Stefani) |
| Filing 15 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant Schnuck Markets, Inc... (Rothermel, Stefani) |
| Filing 14 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #12 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court to St. Louis City Circuit Court filed by Plaintiff Monica Denwiddie. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Simon, Anthony) |
| Filing 13 ENTRY of Appearance by Stefani L. Rothermel for Defendant Schnuck Markets, Inc.. (Rothermel, Stefani) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court to St. Louis City Circuit Court by Plaintiff Monica Denwiddie. (Simon, Anthony) |
| Filing 11 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #6 MOTION to Stay all Proceedings filed by Plaintiff Monica Denwiddie. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Simon, Anthony) |
| Filing 10 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (CSAW) |
| Filing 9 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc... (Rankin, W.) |
| Filing 8 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant Johnson & Johnson.. (Rankin, W.) |
| Filing 7 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #6 MOTION to Stay all Proceedings filed by Defendants Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Rankin, W.) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Stay all Proceedings by Defendants Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.. (Rankin, W.) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc..(Rankin, W.) |
| Filing 4 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Circuit Court, City of St. Louis, filed by Monica Denwiddie, Lisa Leiberman.(BAK) |
| Filing 3 ENTRY of Appearance by Beth A. Bauer for Defendants Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.. (Bauer, Beth) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendants Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. Sent To: Plaintiff (Rankin, W.) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, case number 1922-CC11352, with receipt number AMOEDC-7487364, in the amount of $400 Jury Demand,, filed by Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., Johnson & Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Original Filing Form)(Rankin, W.) |
| Case Opening Notification: All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. and all non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate # (moed-0001.pdf). Judge Assigned: U.S. Magistrate Judge John M. Bodenhausen. (BAK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
