Franks v. City of St. Louis, Missouri et al
Jazmin Franks |
John Hayden, William Olsten and City of St. Louis, Missouri |
4:2019cv02663 |
September 30, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Rodney W Sippel |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Jazmin Franks City of St. Louis, Missouri waiver signed on 9/30/2019, answer due 11/29/2019. (Drake, Kiara) |
Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Jazmin Franks John Hayden waiver signed on 9/30/2019, answer due 11/29/2019. (Drake, Kiara) |
Filing 3 ENTRY of Appearance by James R. Wyrsch for Plaintiff Jazmin Franks. (Wyrsch, James) |
Filing 2 ENTRY of Appearance by Javad M. Khazaeli for Plaintiff Jazmin Franks. (Khazaeli, Javad) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant All Defendants with receipt number AMOEDC-7490336, in the amount of $400 Jury Demand,, filed by Jazmin Franks. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Stockley Verdict, #2 Exhibit B - Templeton TRO, #3 Exhibit C - Templeton Settlement, #4 Exhibit D - Transcript of Testimony, Volume 1, #5 Exhibit E - Ahmad Preliminary Injunction, #6 Civil Cover Sheet, #7 Original Filing Form, #8 Waiver of Service, #9 Waiver of Service, #10 Waiver of Service)(Drake, Kiara) |
Case Opening Notification: Waivers issued 3. Judge Assigned: Honorable Rodney W. Sippel. (JWD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.