Ginsburg v Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. et al
| Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. and Lynda Ginsburg |
| Joe Diefenbach |
| 4:2019cv02675 |
| September 30, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Stephen R Clark |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
Docket Text ORDER: All claims against Defendant Joe Diefenbach are DISMISSED, with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. So Ordered by Judge Stephen R. Clark on 10/28/19. (MCC)
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Lynda Ginsburg of Defendant Diefenbach (Kleefuss, Bret) |
|
Filing 12
Docket Text ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that #11 Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice is GRANTED. Case is dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear their own costs. Signed by District Judge Stephen R. Clark on 10/23/19. (JAB)
|
| Filing 11 STIPULATION Joint Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice by Defendant Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.. (Hershewe, Anne) |
|
Filing 10
Docket Text ORDER: The Court received notice that the parties reached a settlement. All pending deadlines are vacated. The parties shall file a stipulation of dismissal, motion to dismiss, or consent judgment no later than November 8, 2019. So Ordered by Judge Stephen R. Clark on 10/09/19. (MCC)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Settlement Joint Notice of Settlement and Request to Vacate Deadlines by Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. (Dean, Justin) |
|
Filing 8
Docket Text ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that #7 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Petition is GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Stephen R. Clark on 10/3/19. (JAB)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Petition by Defendant Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.. (Dean, Justin) |
| Filing 6 CJRA ORDER (GJL) - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above styled cause is randomly reassigned from Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker to District Judge Stephen R. Clark for all further proceedings (JMP) |
| Filing 5 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Circuit Court, St. Louis County, Missouri, filed by Lynda Ginsburg. (Attachments: #1 EEOC Right to Sue Charging Letter, #2 MCHR Right to Sue Charging Letter)(BAK) |
| Filing 4 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.. Parent companies: The Home Depot, Inc., Subsidiaries: None, Publicly held company: The Home Depot, Inc.,. (Dean, Justin) |
| Filing 3 SUPPLEMENTAL re #1 Notice of Removal Petition, Civil Cover Sheet by Defendant Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Original Filing Form)(Dean, Justin) |
| Case Opening Notification: All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Judge Assigned: U.S. Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker. (BAK) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Plaintiff Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. Sent To: State Court - Executed (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Dean, Justin) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of St. Louis County, case number 19SL-CC03524, with receipt number AMOEDC-7491849, in the amount of $400 Non-Jury Demand,, filed by Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Dean, Justin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
