Reed et al v. Monsanto Company

Plaintiff: Martha L Reed, Robert E. Reed and Martha L. Reed
Defendant: Monsanto Company
Case Number: 4:2019cv02753
Filed: October 10, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: John M Bodenhausen
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 15, 2019 Filing 4 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (CSAW)
October 11, 2019 Case Opening Notification: 1 Summons(es) issued. The summons was emailed to Matthew R. Crimmins. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. and all non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate # (moed-0001.pdf). Judge Assigned: Honorable John M. Bodenhausen. (MFG)
October 10, 2019 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Wes S. Larsen. The Certificate of Good Standing was attached.(Filing fee $100 receipt number AMOEDC-7514662) by Plaintiffs Martha L Reed, Robert E. Reed. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Bar Admissions Addendum)(Larsen, Wes)
October 10, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiffs Martha L Reed, Robert E. Reed Process Server: HPS Process Service (Crimmins, Matthew)
October 10, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant Monsanto Company with receipt number AMOEDC-7514001, in the amount of $400 Jury Demand,, filed by Martha L Reed, Robert E. Reed. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Original Filing Form, #3 Summons)(Crimmins, Matthew)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Reed et al v. Monsanto Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Martha L Reed
Represented By: Matthew Crimmins
Represented By: Wes S Larsen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert E. Reed
Represented By: Matthew Crimmins
Represented By: Wes S Larsen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Martha L. Reed
Represented By: Wes S Larsen
Represented By: Matthew Crimmins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Monsanto Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?