Higgins v. USA
| Reginald Morgan Higgins |
| USA |
| 4:2019cv02863 |
| October 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Rodney W Sippel |
| Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Petitioner Reginald Morgan Higgins. (NEP) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Evidentiary Hearing to Determine Equitable tolling by Petitioner Reginald Morgan Higgins. (NEP) |
| Filing 8 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #7 MOTION for Order to Show Cause filed by Petitioner Reginald Morgan Higgins. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(NEP) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Order to Show Cause to avoid Summary Dismissal by Petitioner Reginald Morgan Higgins. (NEP) |
Filing 6
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER...IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that movant's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket No. #2 ) is DENIED AS MOOT as there is no filing fee for a 28 U.S.C. 2255 motion. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that movant's motion for appointment of counsel (Docket No. #4 ) is DENIED at this time. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that movant shall show cause, in writing and no later than thirty (30) days from the date of this order, why the instant 2255 motion should not be dismissed as time-barred. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if movant fails to comply with this order, his 2255 motion will be dismissed without further proceedings. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 11/5/2019. (NEP)
|
|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 6. Tue Nov 5 13:18:41 CST 2019 (Phillips, Nicole)
|
| ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Tue Oct 22 16:01:29 CDT 2019 (admin,) |
| Case Opening Notification: Judge Assigned: Honorable Rodney W. Sippel. (DLB) |
| ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (DLB) |
| Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT to Accompany #4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Petitioner Reginald Morgan Higgins. (DLB) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Petitioner Reginald Morgan Higgins. (DLB) |
| Filing 3 Inmate Account Statement by Petitioner Reginald Morgan Higgins. (DLB) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN DISTRICT COURT WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS by Petitioner Reginald Morgan Higgins. (DLB) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence by Petitioner Reginald Morgan Higgins. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Envelope)(DLB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Higgins v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: USA | |
| Represented By: | Thomas S. Rea |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Reginald Morgan Higgins | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
