Lincoln County v. Sackler et al
| Lincoln County |
| McKesson Corporation, Caremark RX, LLC, Express Scripts Holding Company, Mallinckrodt LLC, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., F/K/A JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICA INC., CAREMARKPCS HEALTH, LLC, United Health Group Incorporated, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Actavis LLC, ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC. F/K/A WATSON PHARMA, INC.;, Mylan N.V., Missouri CVS LLC, Cardinal Health, Inc., Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., ENDO PHARMACUETICALS INC, Watson Laboratories, Inc., Cephalon, Inc., OptumRx, Inc., Optum, Inc., DEPOMED, Inc., Richard S. Sackler, M.D., Johnson & Johnson, Endo Health Solutions Inc., Wal-Mart, Inc., ALLERGAN PLC F/K/A ACTAVIS PLC F/K/A ACTAVIS, INC., F/K/A WATSON PHARMACUETICALS, INC, Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries, Ltd., Target Corporation, Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation, CVS Health Corporation, Amerisourcebergen Corporation, CAREMARK, LLC, Specgx LLC, Express Scripts, Inc., Noramco, Inc., CVS Pharmacy Inc., MALLINCKRODT, PLC, Express Scripts Pharmacy, Inc., Walgreen Company, Richard S. Sackler, Allergan PLC, Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc., Actavis Pharma, Inc. and Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. |
| 4:2019cv02953 |
| October 31, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Audrey G Fleissig |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 26 RESPONSE to Motion re #18 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court to Forty-Fifth Judicial Circuit, Lincoln County, Missouri filed by Defendants Optum, Inc., OptumRx, Inc., United Health Group Incorporated. (Schlozman, Bradley) |
| Filing 25 REPLY to Response to Motion re #15 MOTION to Stay Pending the Judicial Panel on Multi-district Litigation's Final Transfer Decision filed by Defendants Mallinckrodt LLC, Specgx LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5)(Soriano, Randy) |
| Filing 24 AMENDED Disclosure Of Organization Interests by Defendant Express Scripts Pharmacy, Inc.. Amendment to #10 Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate . (Lang, Christopher) |
| Filing 23 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #15 MOTION to Stay Pending the Judicial Panel on Multi-district Litigation's Final Transfer Decision filed by Plaintiff Lincoln County. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Lowe, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 22 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant United Health Group Incorporated.. (Schlozman, Bradley) |
| Filing 21 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant OptumRx, Inc.. Parent companies: OptumRX Holdings, LLC,. (Schlozman, Bradley) |
| Filing 20 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant Optum, Inc.. Parent companies: United HealthCare Services, Inc.,. (Schlozman, Bradley) |
| Filing 19 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #18 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court to Forty-Fifth Judicial Circuit, Lincoln County, Missouri filed by Plaintiff Lincoln County. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3)(Lowe, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 18 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court to Forty-Fifth Judicial Circuit, Lincoln County, Missouri by Plaintiff Lincoln County. (Lowe, Jeffrey) |
Filing 17
Docket Text ORDER Re: #14 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by Defendants Mallinckrodt LLC, Specgx LLC; ORDERED GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 11/27/2019. (AFC)
|
| Filing 16 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #15 MOTION to Stay Pending the Judicial Panel on Multi-district Litigation's Final Transfer Decision filed by Defendants Mallinckrodt LLC, Specgx LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Soriano, Randy) |
| Filing 15 MOTION to Stay Pending the Judicial Panel on Multi-district Litigation's Final Transfer Decision by Defendants Mallinckrodt LLC, Specgx LLC. (Soriano, Randy) |
| Filing 14 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by Defendants Mallinckrodt LLC, Specgx LLC. (Soriano, Randy) |
| Filing 13 ENTRY of Appearance by Randy J. Soriano for Defendants Mallinckrodt LLC, Specgx LLC. (Soriano, Randy) |
| Filing 12 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant Express Scripts Holding Company. Parent companies: Cigna Corporation, Subsidiaries: none, Publicly held company: Cigna Corporation,. (Lang, Christopher) |
| Filing 11 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant Express Scripts, Inc.. Parent companies: Express Scripts Holding Company, Subsidiaries: none, Publicly held company: Cigna Corporation,. (Lang, Christopher) |
| Filing 10 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant Express Scripts Pharmacy, Inc.. Parent companies: Express Scripts Holding Company, Subsidiaries: none, Publicly held company: Cigna Corporation,. (Lang, Christopher) |
| Filing 9 SUPPLEMENTAL re #1 Notice of Removal Petition,, by Defendants Express Scripts Holding Company, Express Scripts Pharmacy, Inc., Express Scripts, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Fed Officer Cases, #2 Exhibit All Fed Officer Stays, #3 Exhibit MO Transferred Cases)(Lang, Christopher) |
| Filing 8 ENTRY of Appearance by Christopher J. Lang for Defendants Express Scripts Holding Company, Express Scripts Pharmacy, Inc., Express Scripts, Inc.. (Lang, Christopher) |
| Filing 7 CJRA ORDER (GJL). Magistrate Judge Shirley Padmore Mensah termed. Case reassigned to District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig for all further proceedings. (KEK) |
| Filing 6 AMENDED ENTRY of Appearance by Mitchell Lee Herren for Defendants Optum, Inc., OptumRx, Inc., United Health Group Incorporated. (Herren, Mitchell) |
| Filing 5 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (CSAW) |
| Filing 4 ENTRY of Appearance by Mitchell Lee Herren for Defendants Optum, Inc., OptumRx, Inc., United Health Group Incorporated. (Herren, Mitchell) |
| Case Opening Notification: All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. and all non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate # (moed-0001.pdf). Judge Assigned: Honorable Shirley P. Mensah. (JWD) |
| Filing 3 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Lincoln County Circuit Court, filed by Lincoln County.(JWD) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendants Optum, Inc., OptumRx, Inc., United Health Group Incorporated Sent To: Plaintiff (Schlozman, Bradley) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Forty-Fifth Judicial Circuit Lincoln County, case number 19L6-CC00140, with receipt number AMOEDC-7554790, in the amount of $400 Jury Demand,, filed by United Health Group Incorporated, OptumRx, Inc., Optum, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 State Court Records, #2 Exhibit 2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit 3 Original Filing Form)(Schlozman, Bradley) (Main Document 1 replaced on 11/1/2019 to correct the caption of the pleading) (JWD). Modified on 11/1/2019 (JWD). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
