Jones v. Stange
Petitioner: Jason M Jones
Respondent: William Stange
Case Number: 4:2019cv02978
Filed: November 5, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Nannette A Baker
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 16 SUPPLEMENTAL re #12 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Petitioner Jason M Jones. (EAB)
December 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 15 Docket Text ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent's First Motion for Extension of Time is GRANTED. [Doc. 14.] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent shall file the response to the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus no later than January 21, 2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker on December 19, 2019. (EMM)
December 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by Respondent William Stange. (Spillane, Michael)
November 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ENTRY of Appearance by Michael J. Spillane for Respondent William Stange. (Spillane, Michael)
November 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 FULL CONSENT has been received by Petitioner Jason M Jones, Respondent William Stange. (AAS)
November 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 PRO SE MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Petitioner Jason M Jones. (AAS)
November 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Letter from Clerk sent to Petitioner Jason M Jones re: Failure to file Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Notice re: Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction due by 11/25/2019. (KJS)
November 18, 2019 Opinion or Order ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 10. Mon Nov 18 13:27:37 CST 2019 (Shirley, Kelley)
November 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER -TRACK 4: 2254 HABEAS CORPUS PETITION - See Order For Full Details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker on 11/06/2019. (AAS)
November 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner may proceed in forma pauperis in these proceedings.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker on 11/6/2019. (AAS)
November 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (CSAW)
November 6, 2019 Opinion or Order ***REMARK Mailed docs #8 and #9 to Jason Jones this day. (AAS)
November 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Case transferred in from District of Missouri Western; Case Number 4:19-cv-00855. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. Case transferred in electronically.
November 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Case electronically transferred to District of Eastern District of Missouri. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Willis, Kathy)
November 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Case Opening Notification: All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Judge Assigned: Honorable Nannette A. Baker. (JWD)
November 5, 2019 Opinion or Order ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (JWD)
November 5, 2019 Opinion or Order ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Tue Nov 5 16:01:29 CST 2019 (admin,)
October 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: ORDERED that: (1) Petitioner is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis, subject to modification by the Eastern District of Missouri; (2) Petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri for all further proceedings; and (3) Petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel (Doc. [93)) is denied without prejudice, subject to Petitioner reasserting his motion in the Eastern District of Missouri. Signed on 10/29/2019 by District Judge Howard F. Sachs. (Willis, Kathy)
October 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 PETITIONER'S MOTION for appointment of counsel filed by Jason M Jones. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 11/7/2019. (Davies, Cindy)
October 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 IFP FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT filed by Jason M Jones. (Attachment: #1 Exhibit)(Davies, Cindy)
October 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Jason M Jones. (Attachment: #1 Exhibit)(Davies, Cindy)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jones v. Stange
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jason M Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: William Stange
Represented By: Caroline M. Coulter
Represented By: Michael J. Spillane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?