Roy v. Vend Tech-SGI LLC et al
| Betty Jean Roy |
| Vend Tech-SGI LLC and Forrest Garth |
| 4:2019cv03141 |
| November 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Jean C Hamilton |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (MFG) |
| ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Mon Nov 25 14:01:28 CST 2019 (admin,) |
| Case Opening Notification: All non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate # (moed-0001.pdf). Judge Assigned: Honorable Jean C. Hamilton. (MFG) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Betty Jean Roy. (MFG) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Betty Jean Roy. (MFG) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant All Defendants Non-Jury Demand,, filed by Betty Jean Roy. (Attachments: #1 MCHR Charge of Discrimination, #2 EEOC Right to Sue Charging Letter, #3 Attachment, #4 Original Filing Form, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(MFG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
