Cox v. Dignam
Plaintiff: Willie Cox, Jr. and Abbue-Jau
Defendant: Patrick D. Dignam
Case Number: 4:2019cv03183
Filed: December 3, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: John M Bodenhausen
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER OF DISMISSAL pursuant to 28USC1915(e)(2)(B) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED, without prejudice IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that an appeal from this dismissal would not be taken in good faith pursuant to 28USC1915(a)(3). Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 12/5/19. (MRS)
December 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Willie Cox, Jr. motion is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). A separate order of dismissal will be entered herewith.. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 12/5/19. (MRS)
December 5, 2019 Opinion or Order ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 4,5. Thu Dec 5 15:33:57 CST 2019 (Schaefer, Michelle)
December 3, 2019 Filing 3 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (CSAW)
December 3, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Willie Cox, Jr. (JWD)
December 3, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant Patrick D. Dignam, Jury Demand,, filed by Willie Cox, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Original Filing Form)(JWD) Modified on 12/3/2019 (JWD). Clerk's note: Attachment #1 sealed pursuant to Local Rule 2.17 because it contains personal identifiers.
December 3, 2019 ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Tue Dec 3 13:01:59 CST 2019 (admin,)
December 3, 2019 Case Opening Notification: All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Judge Assigned: Honorable John M. Bodenhausen. (JWD)
December 3, 2019 ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (JWD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cox v. Dignam
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Willie Cox, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Abbue-Jau
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Patrick D. Dignam
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?