Johnson v. Grisham et al
| Shane William Johnson |
| Unknown Shultz, Unknown Kelly and Unknown Grisham |
| 4:2019cv03258 |
| December 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Stephen R Clark |
| David D Noce |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Certified Inmate Account Statement by Plaintiff Shane William Johnson. (CLO) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis under 42:1983 (prisoner) by Plaintiff Shane William Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(CLO) |
Filing 7
ORDER : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall mail to plaintiff a copy of the Court's Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs form. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within thirty days of the date of this order, plaintiff must fully complete the motion, sign it, and return it to the Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, plaintiff must submit a certified copy of his institution account statement for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint. A "certified copy" is one that has been certified by an authorized institution officer that it is a true and correct copy. Plaintiff's failure to timely comply with this Order will result in the motion being stricken pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and may also result in the dismissal of this action, without prejudice and without further notice. Response to Court due by 1/29/2020. (Order and form mailed to plaintiff). Signed by District Judge Stephen R. Clark on 12/30/19. (KKS)
|
| Filing 6 CJRA ORDER (GJL). Magistrate Judge David D. Noce termed. Case reassigned to District Judge Stephen R. Clark for all further proceedings (KXS) |
|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 6. Thu Dec 26 13:38:02 CST 2019 (Spurgeon, Katherine)
|
| Filing 5 PRO SE MOTION for Temporary Restraint by Plaintiff Shane William Johnson. (KJS) |
| Filing 4 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (CSAW) |
| ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (DLB) |
| Case Opening Notification: All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Judge Assigned: Honorable David D. Noce. (DLB) |
| ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Thu Dec 12 16:03:02 CST 2019 (admin,) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN DISTRICT COURT WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS by Plaintiff Shane William Johnson. (DLB) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Shane William Johnson. (DLB) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT UNDER 42 U.S.C. 1983 against defendant Unknown Grisham, Unknown Kelly, Unknown Shultz Jury Demand,, filed by Shane William Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Original Filing Form, #2 Memorandum in Support, #3 Envelope, #4 Judge Assignment Label)(DLB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
