Pearson v. Unknown et al
Martez Pearson |
Ron William Dreisilker and Unknown |
4:2019cv03408 |
December 30, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Sarah E Pitlyk |
Sarah E Pitlyk |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Certified Inmate Account Statement by Plaintiff Martez Pearson. (ARL) |
Filing 6 Letter to Court from M. Pearson re: Inmate Account Statement (2nd Attempt) (ARL) |
Filing 5 Letter to the Court from M. Pearson re: Inmate Account Statement. (NEP) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Martez Pearson. (KEK) |
Filing 3 SEALED DOCUMENT re #1 DCM Complaint, by Plaintiff Martez Pearson. (KEK) |
***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Tue Dec 31 16:02:47 CST 2019 (admin,) |
***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (DLB) |
Case Opening Notification: Judge Assigned: Honorable Sarah E. Pitlyk. (DLB) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Martez Pearson. (DLB) |
Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT UNDER 42 U.S.C. 1983 against defendant Ron William Dreisilker, Unknown Jury Demand,, filed by Martez Pearson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Original Filing Form, #3 Envelope, #4 Judge Assignment Label)(DLB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.