Citibank, N.A. v. Alford
| Citibank, N.A. |
| Fletcher Carlton Alford |
| Dentons US, LLP |
| 4:2019mc01009 |
| December 27, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Stephen R Clark |
| Miscellaneous Case |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
Docket Text ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that #9 Consent Motion for Extension of Time to File Stipulation for Dismissal, Motion to Dismiss, or Consent Judgment is GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Stephen R. Clark on 2/21/2020. (CLO)
|
|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 10. Mailed to party not set up for electronic notification. Fri Feb 21 15:36:17 CST 2020 (Olliges, Chelsea)
|
| Filing 9 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Stipulation for Dismissal, Motion to Dismiss, or Consent Judgment ;Proposed extension date March 6, 2020 by Movant Dentons US, LLP. (Rovak, Stephen) |
|
Filing 8
Docket Text ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that #7 Motion to Continue Hearing Pending Settlement is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending deadlines are vacated and all pending motions are stayed. The parties shall file a stipulation of dismissal, motion to dismiss, or consent judgment no later than February 21, 2020. The telephone hearing scheduled for Wednesday, January 22, 2020 at 1:00 p.m. is VACATED. ( Dismissal Paper(s) due by 2/21/2020.). Signed by District Judge Stephen R. Clark on 1/22/20. (KKS)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION to Continue Hearing Pending Settlement by Movant Dentons US, LLP. (Rovak, Stephen) |
|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 8. Mailed to party not set up for electronic notification Wed Jan 22 11:00:45 CST 2020 (Stamm, Katie)
|
| Filing 6 REPLY to Response to Motion re #1 MOTION to Compel Compliance with Subpoenas filed by Defendant Fletcher Carlton Alford. (Alford, Fletcher) |
| Filing 5 ENTRY of Appearance by Stephen H. Rovak for Movant Dentons US, LLP. (Rovak, Stephen) |
|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 4. Mailed to party not set up for electronic notification Wed Jan 15 11:38:26 CST 2020 (Bernsen, John)
|
|
Filing 4
Docket Text ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that a telephone discovery hearing is set for Wednesday, January 22, 2020 at 1:00 p.m. The parties shall use the Court's conference line at: (877) 873-8018. The access code is: 2829372.Re: #1 MOTION to Compel by Defendant Fletcher Carlton Alford. Telephone Conference set for 1/22/2020 01:00 PM by Telephone before District Judge Stephen R. Clark.. Signed by District Judge Stephen R. Clark on 1/14/20. (KKS)
|
| Filing 3 RESPONSE in Opposition re #1 MOTION to Compel (Non-Party Dentons US LLP's Opposition to Motion to Compel) filed by Movant Dentons US, LLP. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Declaration of Stephen Rovak)(Rovak, Stephen) |
| Receipt 4644084858 in the amount of $47.00 for MISC PAPERS/DOCKET FEE on behalf of Fletcher Alford (CCAM) |
| Filing 2 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #1 MOTION to Compel filed by Defendant Fletcher Carlton Alford. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Fletcher Alford in Support of Motion to Compel Compliance with Subpoenas, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G)(MFG) |
| Case Opening Notification: Judge Assigned: Honorable Stephen R. Clark. (MFG) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Compel by Defendant Fletcher Carlton Alford. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope)(MFG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
