Gardner v. City of St. Louis et al
| Kimberly M. Gardner |
| City of St. Louis, Gerard T. Carmody, Charles Lane, Jeffrey Roorda, St. Louis Police Officers Association, Patrick Carmody, Ryann Carmody and St. Louis Police Officers' Association, Fraternal Order of Police Lodge 68 |
| 4:2020cv00060 |
| January 13, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| John A Ross |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 ENTRY of Appearance by MaryAnne Quill for Plaintiff Kimberly M. Gardner. (Quill, MaryAnne) |
| Filing 3 ENTRY of Appearance by Sarah Jane Hunt for Plaintiff Kimberly M. Gardner. (Hunt, Sarah) |
| Filing 2 ENTRY of Appearance by Thomas E. Kennedy, III for Plaintiff Kimberly M. Gardner. (Kennedy, Thomas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant All Defendants with receipt number AMOEDC-7687866, in the amount of $400 Jury Demand,, filed by Kimberly M. Gardner. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Attachment Disclosure of Corporate Interests, #3 Original Filing Form, #4 Summons Notice of Intent to Use Special Process Server, #5 Summons Summons - City of St. Louis, #6 Summons Summons - STLPOA, #7 Summons Summons - J. Roorda, #8 Summons Summons - G. Carmody, #9 Summons Summons - P. Carmody, #10 Summons Summons - R. Carmody, #11 Summons Summons - C. Lane)(Kennedy, Thomas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
