Shelton v. Akins
Jordan E. Shelton |
Richard D. Akins and Andrea Bielecki |
4:2020cv00198 |
February 5, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Henry Edward Autrey |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #13 MOTION for Reconsideration re 10 Docket Text Order, filed by Defendant Richard D. Akins. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Engelbart, Joshua) |
Filing 13 MOTION TO RECONSIDER THE ORDER (DOC. # 10 ) GRANTING PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND EXTEND THE TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING, by Defendant Richard D. Akins. (Engelbart, Joshua) Modified on 3/30/2020 (AAT). |
Filing 12 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the scheduling conference pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 16 set for March 25, 2020, is vacated. The Case Management Order will be issued based on the dates provided by the parties in their Joint Proposed Scheduling Plan. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 3/17/20. (EAB) |
Filing 11 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendant Richard D. Akins, Andrea Bielecki Amendment to #3 Petition (Removal/Transfer) filed by Jordan E. Shelton. Related document: #3 Petition (Removal/Transfer) filed by Jordan E. Shelton.(MCB) |
Filing 10 Docket Text ORDER: Re: #8 MOTION for Leave to File the First Amended Petition by Plaintiff Jordan E. Shelton. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 - Amended Petition)(Falvey, Shaun) filed by Jordan E. Shelton ; LEAVE TO FILE IS GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on March 16, 2020. (MCB) |
Filing 9 JOINT SCHEDULING PLAN by Plaintiff Jordan E. Shelton. . (Falvey, Shaun) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to File the First Amended Petition by Plaintiff Jordan E. Shelton. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Amended Petition)(Falvey, Shaun) |
Filing 7 **SEE MOTION #8 FOR CORRECT DOCUMENT** MOTION for Leave to File the First Amended Petition by Plaintiff Jordan E. Shelton. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1 Amended Petition)(Falvey, Shaun) Modified on 3/13/2020 (MCB). |
Filing 6 RULE 16 ORDER This case is assigned to Track: 2. Joint Scheduling Plan due by 3/17/2020. Rule 16 Conference set for 3/25/2020 10:15 AM by Telephone before District Judge Henry Edward Autrey. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on February 27, 2020. (MCB) Modified on 2/27/2020 (MCB). |
Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by Richard D. Akins.(Engelbart, Joshua) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Richard D. Akins Executed Acknowledgment by Clerk of State Court Sent To: State Court - Executed (Attachments: #1 Attachment Executed Acknowledgment of Notice to State Court and Clerk of Removal)(Engelbart, Joshua) |
Filing 3 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Circuit Court, City of St. Louis, filed by Jordan E. Shelton.(BAK) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Richard Akins Notice to Plaintiff Sent To: Plaintiff (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Notice of Removal pleadings)(Engelbart, Joshua) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of City of St. Louis, case number 2022-CC00071, with receipt number AMOEDC-7734212, in the amount of $400 Jury Demand,, filed by Richard Akins. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Original Filing Form)(Engelbart, Joshua) |
Case Opening Notification: Judge Assigned: U.S. District Judge Henry E. Autrey. (BAK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.