Hanners v. Walmart Inc.
| Katie M. Hanners |
| Walmart Inc. |
| 4:2020cv00259 |
| February 13, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Nannette A Baker |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint by Walmart Inc..(Hamilton, Sheena) |
Filing 10
Docket Text ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Consent Motion For Extension of Time is GRANTED. [Doc. 9.] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant shall file its response to Plaintiff's Petition no later than March 5, 2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker on February 21, 2020. (EMM)
|
| Filing 9 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Plaintiff's Petition by Defendant Walmart Inc.. (Hamilton, Sheena) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Walmart Inc. Sent To: State Court - Executed (Hamilton, Sheena) |
| Filing 7 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (CSAW) |
| Filing 6 ENTRY of Appearance by Meghan E. Ball for Defendant Walmart Inc.. (Ball, Meghan) |
| Filing 5 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Circuit Court of St. Charles County, filed by Katie M. Hanners.(MFG) |
| Case Opening Notification: All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Judge Assigned: Honorable Nannette A. Baker. (MFG) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Walmart Inc. Sent To: Plaintiff (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Hamilton, Sheena) |
| Filing 3 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant Walmart Inc.. Publicly held company: Yes,. (Hamilton, Sheena) |
| Filing 2 ENTRY of Appearance by Sheena R Hamilton for Defendant Walmart Inc.. (Hamilton, Sheena) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court for St. Charles County, Missouri, case number 2011-CC00017, with receipt number AMOEDC-7753615, in the amount of $400 Jury Demand,, filed by Walmart Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Original Filing Form)(Hamilton, Sheena) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hanners v. Walmart Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Walmart Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Sheena R Hamilton |
| Represented By: | Meghan E. Ball |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Katie M. Hanners | |
| Represented By: | Ryan Patrick Schellert |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
