Jarrett v. Ramey
| James L. Jarrett |
| Eileen Ramey |
| 4:2020cv00384 |
| March 11, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Henry Edward Autrey |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
Docket Text ORDER: Re #6 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by Respondent Eileen Ramey; ORDERED ADDITIONAL TIME GRANTED UP TO AND INCLUDING JUNE 6, 2020. (Response to Court due by 6/6/2020.) Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 5/8/20. (EAB)
|
|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 7. copy sent to non-electronic party on this date. Fri May 8 11:44:49 CDT 2020 (Brown, Erica)
|
|
Filing 6
First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by Respondent Eileen Ramey. (Crane, Andrew)
|
|
Filing 5
ENTRY of Appearance by Andrew Jacob Crane for Respondent Eileen Ramey. (Crane, Andrew)
|
|
Filing 4
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. This case is assigned to Track: 4. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the following provisions apply in this case, and will be modified only upon a showing of exceptional circumstances: Respondent must show cause, in writing and within forty-five (45) days of the date of this order, why the relief requested in the instant petition should not be granted. In accordance with Rule 5(b) of the Rules Governing 2254 Cases, Respondent's answer must address the merits of all grounds for relief alleged in the petition. In addition, it must state whether any ground in the petition is barred by a failure to exhaust state remedies, a procedural bar, non- retroactivity, or a statute of limitations. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if Petitioner chooses to file a reply to Respondents answer to the petition, the reply must be filed within sixty (60) days of the date the answer to the petition is filed. If Petitioner fails to timely file a reply, the right to file such a reply may be waived. See Rule 5(e) of the Rules Governing 2254 Cases. (Show Cause Response due by 5/8/2020.) Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 3/23/20. (EAB)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER. This matter is before the Court upon the motion of pro se petitioner James L. Jarrett for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court has reviewed the motion, and concludes that petitioner is unable to pay the filing fee. The motion will be granted. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner James L. Jarrett's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. #2 ) is GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 3/23/20. (EAB)
|
|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 3, 4. copy sent to non-electronic party on this date. Mon Mar 23 11:51:58 CDT 2020 (Brown, Erica)
|
|
***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (DJO)
|
|
Case Opening Notification: Judge Assigned: Honorable Henry E. Autrey. (DJO)
|
|
***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Thu Mar 12 12:04:08 CDT 2020 (admin,)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner James L. Jarrett. (DJO)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION UNDER 28 U.S.C. 2254 FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS BY A PERSON IN STATE CUSTODY by Petitioner James L. Jarrett. (Attachments: #1 Correspondence, #2 Motion for Leave of the Court to Proceed Under Auspices of Factual Innocence, #3 Exhibit List, #4 Exhibit A, #5 Exhibit B, #6 Exhibit C, #7 Exhibit D, #8 Exhibit E, #9 Exhibit F, #10 Exhibit G, #11 Exhibit H, #12 Exhibit I, #13 Exhibit J, #14 Judge Assignment Label, #15 Envelope)(DJO)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jarrett v. Ramey | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: James L. Jarrett | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Eileen Ramey | |
| Represented By: | Caroline M. Coulter |
| Represented By: | Andrew Jacob Crane |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
