Barton County, Missouri v. Allergan PLC et al
Barton County, Missouri |
Mallinckrodt, LLC, Michael Babich, Mylan Institutional, Inc., Actavis, Inc., Cardinal Health 200, LLC, Par Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd., Allergan PLC, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Does 1 through 1000, Cardinal Health 108, LLC, Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cardinal Health 201, Inc., Actavis LLC, Actavis PLC, Cardinal Health, Inc., Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Mylan N.V., Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores East I, LP, Actavis Pharma, Inc., Watson Laboratories, Inc., Cardinal Health 122, LLC, Cephalon, Inc., Par Pharmaceutical Companies, Inc., Endo Health Solutions Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Cardinal Health 100, Inc., Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Walmart Inc., Cardinal Health 110, LLC, Cardinal Health Pharmacy Services, LLC, Cardinal Health 5, LLC, Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Amerisourcebergen Corporation, Morris & Dickson Co., L.L.C., Cardinal Health 132, LLC, SpecGx LLC, John Kapoor, Mallinckrodt, PLC, Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cardinal Health 113, LLC, Janssen Pharmaceutica, Inc. and Cardinal Health 414, LLC |
4:2020cv00387 |
March 11, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Jean C Hamilton |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 REPLY to Response to Motion re #9 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court to Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis filed by Plaintiff Barton County, Missouri. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Edgar, John) |
Filing 16 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #9 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court to Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis filed by Defendants Wal-Mart Stores East I, LP, Walmart Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I)(Jacober, Matthew) |
Filing 15 REPLY to Response to Motion re #11 MOTION to Stay Pending the Judicial Panel on Multi-district Litigation's Final Transfer Decision filed by Defendants Mallinckrodt, LLC, SpecGx LLC. (Soriano, Randy) |
Filing 14 RESPONSE to Motion re #11 MOTION to Stay Pending the Judicial Panel on Multi-district Litigation's Final Transfer Decision filed by Plaintiff Barton County, Missouri. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Envelope H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M)(Edgar, John) |
Filing 13 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #11 MOTION to Stay Pending the Judicial Panel on Multi-district Litigation's Final Transfer Decision filed by Plaintiff Barton County, Missouri. (Edgar, John) |
Filing 12 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #11 MOTION to Stay Pending the Judicial Panel on Multi-district Litigation's Final Transfer Decision filed by Defendants Mallinckrodt, LLC, SpecGx LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3)(Soriano, Randy) |
Filing 11 MOTION to Stay Pending the Judicial Panel on Multi-district Litigation's Final Transfer Decision by Defendants Mallinckrodt, LLC, SpecGx LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Soriano, Randy) |
Filing 10 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #9 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court to Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis filed by Plaintiff Barton County, Missouri. (Edgar, John) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court to Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis by Plaintiff Barton County, Missouri. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Edgar, John) |
Filing 8 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by Defendants Mallinckrodt, LLC, SpecGx LLC. (Soriano, Randy) |
Filing 7 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Circuit Court, City of St. Louis, filed by Barton County, Missouri.(BAK) |
Filing 6 ENTRY of Appearance by Lauren M. Wacker for Defendants Wal-Mart Stores East I, LP, Walmart Inc.. (Wacker, Lauren) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendants Wal-Mart Stores East I, LP, Walmart Inc. Sent To: State Court - Unexecuted (Jacober, Matthew) Modified on 3/11/2020 (BAK). |
Filing 4 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant Wal-Mart Stores East I, LP. Parent companies: None, Subsidiaries: None, Publicly held company: None,. (Jacober, Matthew) |
Filing 3 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant Walmart Inc.. Parent companies: None, Subsidiaries: Walmart Inc. has the following subsidiaries not wholly owned by the subject corporation: Wal-Mart de Mexico, S.A.B. de C.V.; Flipkart Private Limited; Massmart Holdings Ltd., Publicly held company: None,. (Jacober, Matthew) |
Filing 2 ENTRY of Appearance by Matthew A. Jacober for Defendants Wal-Mart Stores East I, LP, Walmart Inc.. (Jacober, Matthew) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from St. Louis City, case number 2022-CC00148, with receipt number AMOEDC-7806794, in the amount of $400 Jury Demand,, filed by Walmart Inc., Wal-Mart Stores East I, LP. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Original Filing Form)(Jacober, Matthew) |
Case Opening Notification: All non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate # (moed-0001.pdf). Judge Assigned: U.S. District Judge Jean C. Hamilton. (BAK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.