Danzig et al v. LoanMe, Inc.
HOWARD DANZIG and EMPLOYERS COMMITTED TO CONTROL HEALTH INSURANCE COSTS, INC. |
LOANME, INC. and LoanMe Inc. |
4:2020cv00389 |
March 11, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Sarah E Pitlyk |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1442 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
|
Filing 40 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF IT'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS by Plaintiff Howard Danzig. (KEK) |
Filing 39 MOTION for Leave to file Plaintiff's Motion to Strike by Plaintiff Howard Danzig. (KEK) |
Filing 38 RESPONSE in Opposition re #26 MOTION to Dismiss Case Defendant's Motion to Dismiss filed by Plaintiff Howard Danzig. (KEK) |
Filing 37 MOTION for Leave to file response to Defendant's reply in support of it's motion to dismiss by Plaintiff Howard Danzig. (KEK) |
Filing 36 RESPONSE to Motion re #32 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Defendant LoanMe Inc.. (Helfand, Scott) |
Filing 35 REPLY to Response to Motion re #26 MOTION to Dismiss Case Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Defendant's Reply in Support of Its Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant LoanMe Inc.. (Helfand, Scott) |
|
|
Filing 33 RESPONSE in Opposition re #26 MOTION to Dismiss Case Defendant's Motion to Dismiss filed by Plaintiff Howard Danzig. (ARL) |
Filing 32 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings by Plaintiff Howard Danzig. (ARL) |
Filing 31 MOTION for Leave to File Judgment on the Pleadings by Plaintiff Howard Danzig. (ARL) |
|
|
Filing 29 PLAINTIFF'S REBUTTAL TO DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S PURPORTED MOTION TO REMAND #25 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(KEK) |
Filing 28 MOTION for Leave to file a rebuttal to Defendant's response to Plaintiff's Purported motion to remand by Plaintiff Howard Danzig. (KEK) |
Filing 27 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #26 MOTION to Dismiss Case Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Defendant's Memorandum in Support of Its Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant LoanMe Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Memorandum)(Helfand, Scott) |
Filing 26 MOTION to Dismiss Case Defendant's Motion to Dismiss by Defendant LoanMe Inc.. (Helfand, Scott) |
Filing 25 RESPONSE to Motion re #10 MOTION for Leave to DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO MOTION TO REMAND filed by Defendant LoanMe Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration)(Helfand, Scott) |
|
|
Filing 23 NOTICE of Withdrawal by Plaintiff Employers Committed To Control Health Insurance Costs, Inc. (NEP) |
Filing 22 MOTION for Leave to File Response to Defendant by Plaintiffs Howard Danzig, Employers Committed To Control Health Insurance Costs, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Plaintiff's Objection to Defendant's Motion)(NEP) |
|
|
|
Filing 20 MEMORANDUM in Support of #19 MOTION for Default Judgment filed by Plaintiffs Howard Danzig, Employers Committed To Control Health Insurance Costs, Inc. (KXS) |
Filing 19 MOTION for Clerk's Entry of Default Judgment by Plaintiffs Howard Danzig, Employers Committed To Control Health Insurance Costs, Inc. (KXS) |
|
|
Filing 17 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer DEFENDANT LOANME, INC.'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING by Defendant LoanMe Inc.. (Helfand, Scott) |
Filing 16 ENTRY of Appearance by Aaron B. Chapin for Defendant LoanMe Inc.. (Chapin, Aaron) |
Filing 15 ENTRY of Appearance by Scott Helfand for Defendant LoanMe Inc.. (Helfand, Scott) |
|
|
|
|
|
Filing 11 PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 by Plaintiffs Howard Danzig, Employers Committed To Control Health Insurance Costs, Inc. (KEK) |
Filing 10 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE by Plaintiffs Howard Danzig, Employers Committed To Control Health Insurance Costs, Inc. (KEK) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF FILING by Plaintiff Howard Danzig. (KEK) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Aaron B. Chapin. The Certificate of Good Standing was attached.(Filing fee $100 receipt number AMOEDC-7814777) by Defendant LoanMe Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Chapin, Aaron) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Scott J. Helfand. The Certificate of Good Standing was attached.(Filing fee $100 receipt number AMOEDC-7814702) by Defendant LoanMe Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Helfand, Scott) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant LoanMe Inc. Sent To: State Court - Executed (Hurtt, Robert) |
Filing 5 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Circuit Court, St. Louis County, Missouri, filed by Howard Danzig, Employers Committed To Control Health Insurance Costs, Inc..(BAK) |
Case Opening Notification: Judge Assigned: U.S. District Judge Sarah E. Pitlyk. (BAK) |
Filing 4 ENTRY of Appearance by Robert Jacob Hurtt, Jr for Defendant LoanMe, Inc.. (Hurtt, Robert) |
Filing 3 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant LoanMe, Inc.. Parent companies: None, Subsidiaries: None, Publicly held company: None,. (Hurtt, Robert) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant LoanMe, Inc. Sent To: Plaintiff (Hurtt, Robert) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of St. Louis County, State of Missouri, case number 20SL-CC00876, with receipt number AMOEDC-7807476, in the amount of $400 Jury Demand,, filed by LoanMe, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Circuit Court File, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Original Filing Form)(Hurtt, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.