Ambus v. Frontline Asset Strategies, LLC
Ambus and Joseph M. Ambus |
Frontline Asset Strategies, LLC |
4:2020cv00396 |
March 16, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Catherine D Perry |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Joseph M. Ambus with Prejudice (Volheim, Nathan) |
![]() |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Settlement by Joseph M. Ambus (Volheim, Nathan) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Joseph M. Ambus. Frontline Asset Strategies, LLC served on 3/25/2020, answer due 4/15/2020. (Volheim, Nathan) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiff Joseph M. Ambus Process Server: Jose Pineiro (Volheim, Nathan) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant Frontline Asset Strategies, LLC with receipt number AMOEDC-7816539, in the amount of $400 Jury Demand,, filed by Joseph M. Ambus. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Original Filing Form)(Volheim, Nathan) |
Case Opening Notification: 1 Summons(es) issued. The summons was emailed to attorney Nathan Charles Volheim. All non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate # (moed-0001.pdf). Judge Assigned: U.S. District Judge Catherine D. Perry. (BAK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.