Perficient, Inc. v. Palfery
| Perficient, Inc. |
| DAVID PALFERY |
| 4:2020cv00618 |
| May 6, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| John A Ross |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice John J. Scharkey. The Certificate of Good Standing was attached.(Filing fee $100 receipt number AMOEDC-7957801) by Defendant David Palfery. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Scharkey, John)
|
|
Filing 7
Docket Text ORDER: Re: #6 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Robert D. Sweeney by Defendant David Palfery (Sweeney, Robert) ; ORDERED GRANTED. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 6/10/20. (JAB)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Robert D. Sweeney. The Certificate of Good Standing was attached.(Filing fee $100 receipt number AMOEDC-7956399) by Defendant David Palfery. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Sweeney, Robert)
|
|
Filing 5
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Perficient, Inc. David Palfery waiver signed on 5/6/2020, answer due 7/6/2020. (Wesselschmidt, Benjamin)
|
|
Case Opening Notification: Waivers issued 1. Judge Assigned: U.S. District Judge John A. Ross. (BAK)
|
|
Filing 4
ENTRY of Appearance by Benjamin R. Wesselschmidt for Plaintiff Perficient, Inc.. (Wesselschmidt, Benjamin)
|
|
Filing 3
ENTRY of Appearance by Lyndon P. Sommer for Plaintiff Perficient, Inc.. (Sommer, Lyndon)
|
|
Filing 2
DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Plaintiff Perficient, Inc... (Sommer, Lyndon)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against defendant DAVID PALFERY with receipt number AMOEDC-7901190, in the amount of $400 Non-Jury Demand,, filed by Perficient, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - 2018 - Palfery Non-Compete Agreement, #2 Exhibit B - Confidentiality Agreement, #3 Exhibit C-1 - 2017 - Palfery Non-Compete Agreement, #4 Exhibit C-2 - 2016 - Palfery Non-Compete Agreement, #5 Exhibit C-3 - 2015 - Palfery Non-Compete Agreement, #6 Exhibit C-4 - 2014 - Palfery Non-Compete Agreement, #7 Exhibit D - Palfery LinkedIn Profile, #8 Exhibit E - 3Cloud website, #9 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #10 Original Filing Form Original Filing Form, #11 Waiver of Service Waiver of Service)(Sommer, Lyndon)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Perficient, Inc. v. Palfery | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: DAVID PALFERY | |
| Represented By: | Robert D Sweeney |
| Represented By: | John J. Scharkey, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Perficient, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Benjamin R. Wesselschmidt |
| Represented By: | Lyndon P. Sommer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
