Sharma v. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC et al
| Dian Sharma |
| Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, Sanofi US Services, Inc., Chattem, Inc. and Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. |
| 4:2020cv00619 |
| May 6, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| David D Noce |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ***REMARK ---DETAILS: Case transferred from Missouri Eastern has been opened in Southern District of Florida as case 9:20-cv-80814, filed 05/19/2020. (MRC) |
Filing 12
ORDER OF MDL TRANSFER (CTO 17) to: Southern District of Florida regarding multidistrict litigation by John W. Nichols, Clerk of the Panel. Case transferred via CM/ECF extraction. (DLB)
|
|
Filing 11
CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO 17) regarding multidistrict litigation by John W. Nichols, Clerk of the Panel. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 5/18/2020. (DLB)
|
| Filing 10 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Parent companies: Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Subsidiaries: none, Publicly held company: none,. (Trummel, Rachael) |
|
Filing 9
Docket Text ORDER: Re: #8 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Defendants. ORDERED GRANTED. Answer or other responsive pleading is due no later than June 3, 2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge David D. Noce on 05/13/2020. (SMB)
|
| Filing 8 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Defendants Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Sanofi US Services, Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC. (Rankin, W.) |
| Filing 7 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (CSAW) |
| Filing 6 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Circuit Court, St. Louis County, Missouri, filed by Dian Sharma.(BAK) |
| Filing 5 SUPPLEMENTAL - State Court docket sheet. (BAK) |
| Case Opening Notification: All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. and all non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate # (moed-0001.pdf). Judge Assigned: U.S. Magistrate Judge David D. Noce. (BAK) |
| Filing 4 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC.. (Rankin, W.) |
| Filing 3 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant Sanofi US Services, Inc... (Rankin, W.) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendants Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Sanofi US Services, Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC Sent To: Plaintiff (Rankin, W.) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of St. Louis County, State of MO, case number 20SL-CC01592, with receipt number AMOEDC-7901543, in the amount of $400 Jury Demand,, filed by Sanofi US Services, Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Original Filing Form)(Rankin, W.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
