Goldman v. Tapestry, Inc. et al
| Janice Goldman |
| Tapestry, Inc. and Kate Spade, LLC |
| 4:2020cv00748 |
| June 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Rodney W Sippel |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiff Janice Goldman Process Server: Harry Yiatras (Attachments: #1 Summons)(Bauman, Christopher) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiff Janice Goldman Process Server: Harry Yiatras (Attachments: #1 Summons )(Bauman, Christopher) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant Kate Spade, LLC, Tapestry, Inc. Jury Demand,, filed by Janice Goldman. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Civil Cover Sheet , #6 Original Filing Form)(Bauman, Christopher) |
| Case Opening Notification: 2 Summons(es) issued. The summons were emailed to attorney Christopher O. Bauman. All non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate # (moed-0001.pdf). Judge Assigned: U.S. District Judge Rodney W. Sippel. (BAK) |
| Receipt: $ 400.00, receipt number AMOEDC-7955525 for Civil Filing Fee. (BAK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
