Marler v. Wal-Mart Stores East I, L.P.
Dorothy Marler |
Wal-Mart Stores East I, L.P. |
4:2020cv00790 |
June 17, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Sarah E Pitlyk |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 JOINT SCHEDULING PLAN by Plaintiff Dorothy Marler. . (Mandel, Alan) |
Filing 8 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant Wal-Mart Stores East I, L.P.. Parent companies: none, Subsidiaries: none, Publicly held company: none,. (Rahoy, John) |
Filing 7 RULE 16 ORDER - This case is assigned to Track: 2. Joint Scheduling Plan due by 8/10/2020. Rule 16 Conference set for 8/18/2020 03:30 PM by Telephone Conference in Chambers before District Judge Sarah E. Pitlyk. Signed by District Judge Sarah E. Pitlyk on 7/20/20. (ARL) |
Filing 6 Electronic Notice re: Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate to Defendant Wal-Mart Stores East I, L.P.. Pursuant to Local Rule 2.09, every non-governmental organizational party must file a Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate within ten (10) days of the party's first pleading or entry of appearance. Please complete and file the certificate as soon as possible # (moed-0001.pdf). Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate due by 7/23/2020. (NEP) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Wal-Mart Stores East I, L.P..(Rahoy, John) |
Filing 4 ENTRY of Appearance by John P. Rahoy for Defendant Wal-Mart Stores East I, L.P.. (Rahoy, John) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Dorothy Marler. Wal-Mart Stores East I, L.P. served on 6/29/2020, answer due 7/20/2020. (Mandel, Alan) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiff Dorothy Marler Process Server: Sheriff of St. Louis County (Mandel, Alan) |
Case Opening Notification: 1 Summons(es) issued. The summons was emailed to Alan S. Mandel. All non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate # (moed-0001.pdf). Judge Assigned: Honorable Sarah E. Pitlyk. (MFG) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant Wal-Mart Stores East I, L.P. with receipt number AMOEDC-7973235, in the amount of $400 Jury Demand,, filed by Dorothy Marler. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Summons, #3 Original Filing Form Original Filing Form)(Mandel, Alan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Marler v. Wal-Mart Stores East I, L.P. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Wal-Mart Stores East I, L.P. | |
Represented By: | John P. Rahoy |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Dorothy Marler | |
Represented By: | Alan S. Mandel |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.