Gilmore v. Medicredit, Inc.
Ebony M. Gilmore |
Medicredit, Inc. |
4:2020cv00961 |
July 24, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Catherine D Perry |
Other Statutory Actions |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Alternative Dispute Resolution. This case is referred to: Mediation. Designation of Lead Counsel: Leigh Michael Kline. Please see Order for full details. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 09/17/2020. (ANP) |
Filing 10 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER This case is assigned to Track: 2. Please see CMO for full details. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 09/17/2020. (ANP) |
Filing 9 JOINT SCHEDULING PLAN by Plaintiff Ebony M. Gilmore. . (Kline, Leigh) |
Filing 8 RULE 16 ORDER This case is assigned to Track: 1 (Expedited). Joint Scheduling Plan due by 9/10/2020. Rule 16 Conference set for 9/17/2020 11:00 AM in Telephone Conference in Chambers before District Judge Catherine D. Perry. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on September 14, 2020. (BRP) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by Medicredit, Inc..(Ryan, John) |
Filing 6 Docket Text ORDER: Re: #5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #4 Petition (Removal/Transfer) by Defendant Medicredit, Inc. ; ORDERED GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 7/27/20. (CDP) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #4 Petition (Removal/Transfer) by Defendant Medicredit, Inc.. (Ryan, John) |
Filing 4 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Circuit Court of St. Louis County, filed by Ebony M. Gilmore. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(MFG) |
Filing 3 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant Medicredit, Inc.. Parent companies: Medicredit is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parallon Revenue Cycle Services, Inc., Subsidiaries: None, Publicly held company: None,. (Ryan, John) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Medicredit, Inc. Sent To: Plaintiff (Ryan, John) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from St. Louis County Circuit Court, case number 20SL-AC09459, with receipt number AMOEDC-8037384, in the amount of $400 Jury Demand,, filed by Medicredit, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court File, #2 Original Filing Form, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ryan, John) |
Case Opening Notification: Judge Assigned: Honorable Catherine D. Perry. (MFG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Gilmore v. Medicredit, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Medicredit, Inc. | |
Represented By: | John D. Ryan |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Ebony M. Gilmore | |
Represented By: | Leigh Michael Kline |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.