Dotec Corp v. Unirac, Inc.
| Dotec Corp |
| Unirac, Inc. |
| 4:2020cv00973 |
| July 27, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Sarah E Pitlyk |
| Contract: Other |
| 12 U.S.C. ยง 2615 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the following schedule shall apply in this case, and will be modified only upon a showing of exceptional circumstances: This case is assigned to Track: 2. Motion to Join Parties due by 4/1/2021. Discovery Completion due by 9/1/2021. Non-Dispositive Motions due by 9/15/2021. ADR Future Reference 6/1/2021. Dispositive Motions due by 10/1/2021. Jury Trial set for 3/7/2022 09:00 AM in Courtroom 16S - St. Louis before District Judge Sarah E. Pitlyk. Motion in Limine due by 2/21/2022. [SEE ORDER FOR FULL DETAILS] Signed by District Judge Sarah E. Pitlyk on 9/4/2020. (KEK)
|
| Filing 15 ELECTRONIC MINUTE ENTRY (no pdf attached) for proceedings held before District Judge Sarah E. Pitlyk: Rule 16 Conference held on 9/3/2020. Conference held by phone. CMO to issue. (Notice only, no.pdf attached.). (proceedings started: 3:03 pm) (proceedings ended: 3:23 pm) (ANP) |
| Filing 14 JOINT SCHEDULING PLAN by Plaintiff Dotec Corp. . (Kasperek, Michael) |
| ***REMARK - Document 13 was deleted due to filing error, refiled as document 14. (Petri, Alexis) |
| Filing 12 ENTRY of Appearance by Michael A. Kasperek for Plaintiff Dotec Corp. (Kasperek, Michael) |
| Filing 11 ENTRY of Appearance by Michael A. Kasperek for Plaintiff Dotec Corp. (Kasperek, Michael) |
|
Filing 10
Docket Text ORDER: Re: #9 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice John M. Lingelbach. The Certificate of Good Standing was attached.(Filing fee $100 receipt number AMOEDC-8052859) by Defendant Unirac, Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Lingelbach, John) filed by Unirac, Inc.; ORDERED GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Sarah E. Pitlyk on 8/4/2020. (KEK)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice John M. Lingelbach. The Certificate of Good Standing was attached.(Filing fee $100 receipt number AMOEDC-8052859) by Defendant Unirac, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Lingelbach, John) |
|
Filing 8
RULE 16 ORDER This case is assigned to Track: 2 Joint Scheduling Plan due by 8/24/2020. Rule 16 Conference set for 9/3/2020 03:00 PM in Telephone Conference in Chambers before District Judge Sarah E. Pitlyk. Signed by District Judge Sarah E. Pitlyk on 7/31/2020. (NEP)
|
| Filing 7 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Plaintiff Dotec Corp. Parent companies: None, Subsidiaries: None, Publicly held company: None,. (Vogler, Vincent) |
| Filing 6 Electronic Notice re: Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate Pursuant to Local Rule 2.09, every non-governmental organizational party must file a Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate within ten (10) days of the party's first pleading or entry of appearance. Please complete and file the certificate as soon as possible # (moed-0001.pdf). Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate due by 8/7/2020. (KEK) |
| Case Opening Notification: All non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate # (moed-0001.pdf). Judge Assigned: Honorable Sarah E. Pitlyk. (MFG) |
| Filing 5 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant Unirac, Inc.. Parent companies: Unirac Holdings, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Subsidiaries: None, Publicly held company: None,. (MFG) |
| Filing 4 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Circuit Court of St. Charles County, filed by Dotec Corp. (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(MFG) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint by Unirac, Inc..(Blongewicz, Jon) |
| Filing 2 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Notice of Removal by Defendant Unirac, Inc.. (Blongewicz, Jon) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 11th Judicial Circuit St. Charles County, case number 2011-CC00581, with receipt number AMOEDC-8040714, in the amount of $400 Jury Demand,, filed by Unirac, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Petition, #2 Exhibit State Court Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Form Disclosure of Organizational Interest Certificate)(Blongewicz, Jon) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Dotec Corp v. Unirac, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Dotec Corp | |
| Represented By: | Vincent D. Vogler |
| Represented By: | Michael A. Kasperek |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Unirac, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Jon A Blongewicz |
| Represented By: | John M. Lingelbach |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
