Moore v. Brown
Kinita Moore |
Charlene Brown |
4:2020cv01029 |
August 6, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Stephen R Clark |
Labor: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: The Court orders that Plaintiff shall show cause, in writing, on or before October 23, 2020 why this Court should not grant #6 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Signed by District Judge Stephen R. Clark on 9/25/2020. (CLO) |
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 13. Mailed to party not set up for electronic delivery. Fri Sep 25 07:42:34 CDT 2020 (Olliges, Chelsea) |
Filing 12 MOTION to Continue Restraining Order by Plaintiff Kinita Moore. (CLO) |
Filing 11 FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT - CJA 23 by Plaintiff Kinita Moore. (CLO) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Kinita Moore. (CLO) (Main Document 10 replaced on 9/24/2020) (CLO). |
Filing 9 MOTION for Hearing by Plaintiff Kinita Moore. (CLO) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Change of Address by Plaintiff Kinita Moore. (CLO) Address updated in CM/ECF on 9/23/2020 (CMC). |
Filing 7 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #6 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Defendant Charlene Brown. (Llewellyn, Nicholas) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Defendant Charlene Brown. (Llewellyn, Nicholas) |
Filing 5 Judge Clark enters a Standing Order in all of his cases as follows: See Order for details #https://www.moed.uscourts.gov/judge/stephen-r-clark (JAB) (JAB). |
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 5. Mailed to party not set up for electronic notification Fri Aug 7 11:58:36 CDT 2020 (Bernsen, John) |
Filing 4 SUPPLEMENTAL State Court Docket Sheet re #1 Notice of Removal Petition. (JWD) |
Filing 3 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Missouri, filed by Kinita Moore.(JWD) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Charlene Brown Sent To: Plaintiff (JWD) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from St. Louis City Circuit Court, case number 2022-PN01366, Non-Jury Demand,, filed by Charlene Brown. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Original Filing Form, #3 Notice of Filing to Plaintiff, #4 Notice of Filing Notice of Removal State Court Unexecuted, #5 State Court Petition)(Llewellyn, Nicholas) Modified on 8/6/2020 to relect copy of notice to state court is unexecuted (JWD). |
Case Opening Notification: Judge Assigned: Honorable Stephen R. Clark. (JWD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Moore v. Brown | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Charlene Brown | |
Represented By: | Nicholas P. Llewellyn |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Kinita Moore | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.