Reynolds v. Precythe et al
| Deavonie L. Reynolds |
| Jeff Norman, Diana Simmerly, Unknown Word, Bradley Jackman, Richard Adams, Unknown Frayley, Ann Precythe and Unknown Njucko |
| 4:2020cv01124 |
| August 20, 2020 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| John A Ross |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (JWD) |
| Case Opening Notification: Judge Assigned: Honorable John A. Ross. (JWD) |
| ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Fri Aug 21 17:01:47 CDT 2020 (admin,) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Temporary Restraining Order by Plaintiff Deavonie L. Reynolds. (JWD) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Deavonie L. Reynolds. (JWD) |
| Filing 3 Certified Inmate Account Statement by Plaintiff Deavonie L. Reynolds. (JWD) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis under 42:1983 (prisoner) by Plaintiff Deavonie L. Reynolds. (JWD) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, Jury Demand,, filed by Deavonie L. Reynolds. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits - Grievance Documents, #2 Exhibit A-D, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Original Filing Form, #5 Envelope)(JWD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.