T.L. v. St. Ann, City of et al
| Rachel Kozma and T. L. |
| St. Ann, City of and Antonio Payton |
| 4:2020cv01165 |
| August 27, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Sarah E Pitlyk |
| P.I.: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 ENTRY of Appearance by Joseph Neely for Defendants Antonio Payton, St. Ann, City of. (Neely, Joseph) |
| Filing 5 ENTRY of Appearance by Timothy J. Reichardt for Defendants Antonio Payton, St. Ann, City of. (Reichardt, Timothy) |
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by T. L. Antonio Payton waiver signed on 8/27/2020, answer due 10/26/2020. (Pleban, J.) |
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by T. L. St. Ann, City of waiver signed on 8/27/2020, answer due 10/26/2020. (Pleban, J.) |
| Filing 2 ENTRY of Appearance by Benjamin Paul Kates for Plaintiff T. L.. (Kates, Benjamin) |
| Case Opening Notification: Waivers issued 3 (individual waivers issued for defendant Payne's individual and official capacities). Judge Assigned: Honorable Sarah E. Pitlyk. (JWD) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant All Defendants with receipt number AMOEDC-8107008, in the amount of $400 Jury Demand,, filed by T. L., Rachel Kozma. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Original Filing Form, #3 Waiver of Service)(Pleban, J.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
