Ousley v. Ramey
| Jerry Ousley |
| Eileen Ramey |
| 4:2020cv01223 |
| September 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Noelle C Collins |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 11. Sent to non-electronic party this date. Wed Oct 28 09:05:24 CDT 2020 (Porter, Brittany)
|
|
Filing 11
Docket Text ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent's Motion for Leave to File Respondent's Exhibits Under Seal (Doc. #9 ) is GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Noelle C. Collins on 10/27/2020. (KBL)
|
| Filing 10 SEALED DOCUMENT by Respondent Eileen Ramey. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Ousley's Transcript of Second Trial, #2 Exhibit C State's First Direct Appeal Responsive Brief and Appendix, #3 Exhibit D First Direct Appeal Legal File, #4 Exhibit G Ousley's Substitute Direct Appeal Brief, #5 Exhibit L Ousley's Second Direct Appeal Legal File, #6 Exhibit O Ousley's PCR Appeal Brief and Appendix, #7 Exhibit R PCR Transcript, #8 Exhibit S PCR Legal File, #9 Exhibit X Circuit Court Rule 91 Petition, #10 Exhibit Z Ousley's Missouri Court of Appeals Rule 91 Petition, #11 Exhibit Exhibit BB Ousley's Missouri Supreme Court Rule 91 Petition, #12 Exhibit DD Ousley's Transcript of First Trial)(Clarke, Andrew) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Seal Document Exhibits A, C, D, G, L, O, R, S, X, Z, BB, DD by Respondent Eileen Ramey. (Clarke, Andrew) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Filing Exhibit with the Clerk's Office in paper format by Respondent Eileen Ramey (Clarke, Andrew) |
| Filing 7 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Respondent Eileen Ramey. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A Ousley's Transcript of Second Trial, #2 Exhibit B Ousley's First Direct Appeal Brief and Appendix, #3 Exhibit C State's First Direct Appeal Responsive Brief and Appendix, #4 Exhibit D First Direct Appeal Legal File, #5 Exhibit E Ousley's First Direct Appeal Supplemental Legal File, #6 Exhibit Exhibit F Missouri Court of Appeals's First Opinion, #7 Exhibit Exhibit G Ousley's Substitute Direct Appeal Brief, #8 Exhibit H State's Substitute Direct Appeal Responsive Brief, #9 Exhibit I Missouri Supreme Court's Majority Opinion, #10 Exhibit J Ousley's Second Direct Appeal Brief and Appendix, #11 Exhibit K State's Second Direct Appeal Responsive Brief, #12 Exhibit L Ousley's Second Direct Appeal Legal File, #13 Exhibit M Ousley's Second Direct Appeal Supplemental Legal File, #14 Exhibit N Missouri Court of Appeals's Order and Memorandum, #15 Exhibit O Ousley's PCR Appeal Brief and Appendix, #16 Exhibit P State's PCR Appeal Responsive Brief and Appendix, #17 Exhibit Q Ousley's PCR Reply Brief, #18 Exhibit R PCR Transcript, #19 Exhibit S PCR Legal File, #20 Exhibit T Missouri Court of Appeals's PCR Order and Memorandum, #21 Exhibit U Missouri Court of Appeals's PCR Mandate, #22 Exhibit V Ousley's Motion to Recall PCR Mandate, #23 Exhibit W Missouri Court of Appeals's Denial of Ousley's Motion to Recall PCR Mandate, #24 Exhibit X Circuit Court Rule 91 Petition, #25 Exhibit Y Circuit Court Rule 91 Judgment, #26 Exhibit Exhibit Z Ousley's Missouri Court of Appeals Rule 91 Petition, #27 Exhibit AA Missouri Court of Appeals's Rule 91 Denial, #28 Exhibit BB Ousley's Missouri Supreme Court Rule 91 Petition, #29 Exhibit CC Missouri Supreme Court's Rule 91 Denial, #30 Exhibit DD Ousley's Transcript of First Trial)(Clarke, Andrew) |
| Filing 6 FULL CONSENT has been received by Petitioner Jerry Ousley, Respondent Eileen Ramey. (TMT) |
| Filing 4 ENTRY of Appearance by Andrew Clarke for Respondent Eileen Ramey. (Clarke, Andrew) |
|
Filing 3
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: This case is assigned to Track: 4 (2254 Habeas Corpus Petition) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the following provisions apply in this case, and will be modified only upon a showing of exceptional circumstances: This case has been randomly assigned to a United States Magistrate Judge. The parties have twenty-one (21) days from their entry of appearance to file their Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction forms. Respondent must show cause, in writing and within forty-five (45) days of the date of this order, why the relief requested in the instant petition should not be granted. In accordance with Rule 5(b) of the Rules Governing 2254 Cases, Respondent's answer must address the merits of all grounds for relief alleged in the petition. In addition, it must state whether any ground in the petition is barred by a failure to exhaust state remedies, a procedural bar, non-retroactivity, or a statute of limitations. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if Petitioner chooses to file a reply to Respondents answer to the petition, the reply must be filed within sixty (60) days of the date the answer to the petition is filed. If Petitioner fails to timely file a reply, the right to file such a reply must be waived. See Rule 5(e) of the Rules Governing 2254 Cases. (Show Cause Response due by 10/26/2020.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Noelle C. Collins on 9/11/2020. (TMT)
|
|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 3. Fri Sep 11 15:12:24 CDT 2020 (Tillman, Tiffani)
|
| Receipt 4644089348 in the amount of $5.00 for WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS on behalf of JERRY OUSLEY (CCAM) |
| Filing 2 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (FLJ) |
| ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (DLB) |
| Case Opening Notification: All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Judge Assigned: Honorable Noelle C. Collins. (DLB) |
| ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Thu Sep 10 11:00:55 CDT 2020 (admin,) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5.) by Petitioner Jerry Ousley. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Envelope, #3 Judge Assignment Label)(DLB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ousley v. Ramey | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Eileen Ramey | |
| Represented By: | Office of Missouri Attorney General - Habeas Division |
| Represented By: | Andrew Clarke |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Jerry Ousley | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
