Woods v. USA
| Brandon Mardell Woods |
| USA |
| 4:2020cv01248 |
| September 14, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Henry Edward Autrey |
| Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
Docket Text ORDER: Re: #6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #3 Case Management Order,, by Respondent USA. (Roy, Jennifer) filed by USA ; ADDITIONAL TIME IS GRANTED UP TO AND INCLUDING DECEMBER 2, 2020. ( Show Cause Response due by 12/2/2020.) Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on November 2, 2020. (MCB)
|
|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 7. sent to non-electronic party this date. Mon Nov 2 10:33:52 CST 2020 (Berg, Melanie)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #3 Case Management Order,, by Respondent USA. (Roy, Jennifer) |
| Filing 5 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Brandon Woods. Returned document(s): #3 Case Management Order. New address given to CMC and clerk resent document. (MCB) |
| Filing 4 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Brandon Woods. Returned document(s): Complaint Letter Created. New address given to CMC and clerk resent document. (MCB) |
|
Filing 3
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER - TRACK 4: 2255 MOTION TO VACATE- IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the following provisions apply in this case, and will be modified only upon a showing of exceptional circumstances:This case has been assigned to Track 4 (Administrative).Respondent must show cause, in writing and within forty-five (45) days of the date of this order, why the relief requested in the instant motion to vacate should not be granted. Show Cause Response due by 10/30/2020.. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 09/15/2020. (AAT)
|
|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 3. Tue Sep 15 16:23:08 CDT 2020 (Thompson, Alicia)
|
| Filing 2 Non-Certified Inmate Account Statement by Petitioner Brandon Mardell Woods. (JWD) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence by Petitioner Brandon Mardell Woods. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JWD) |
| Case Opening Notification: Judge Assigned: Honorable Henry E. Autrey. (JWD) |
| ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Mon Sep 14 16:00:50 CDT 2020 (admin,) |
| ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (JWD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Woods v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: USA | |
| Represented By: | Jennifer J. Roy |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Brandon Mardell Woods | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
