Webbe v Casey's Marketing Company
Plaintiff: Casey's Marketing Company and Charles J Webbe
Defendant: Casey's Marketing Company doing business as Casey's General Store
Case Number: 4:2020cv01266
Filed: September 15, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Henry Edward Autrey
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 13, 2020 Filing 9 NOTICE Counsel Participating in Rule 16 Conference: by Plaintiff Charles J Webbe (Gogel, Jeremy)
November 12, 2020 Filing 8 NOTICE by Defendant Casey's Marketing Company re #7 Rule 16 Order, Attorney to Attend Rule 16 Conference (Teasdale, Douglas)
November 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 RULE 16 ORDER. This case is assigned to Track: 2 (Standard). Joint Scheduling Plan due by 11/23/2020. Rule 16 Conference set for 11/30/2020 10:00 AM in Telephone Conference in Chambers before District Judge Henry Edward Autrey. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 11/9/20. (EAB)
September 16, 2020 Filing 6 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Circuit Court, St. Francois County, Missouri, filed by Charles J Webbe.(BAK)
September 16, 2020 Case Opening Notification: Judge Assigned: U.S. District Judge Henry E. Autrey. (BAK)
September 15, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Plaintiff Casey's Marketing Company Sent To: State Court - Executed (Teasdale, Douglas)
September 15, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Plaintiff Casey's Marketing Company Sent To: Plaintiff (Teasdale, Douglas)
September 15, 2020 Filing 3 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Plaintiff Casey's Marketing Company. Parent companies: Casey's General Stores, Inc., Subsidiaries: None, Publicly held company: Casey's General Stores, Inc.,. (Teasdale, Douglas)
September 15, 2020 Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint filed by Plaintiff Charles J Webbe by Casey's Marketing Company.(Teasdale, Douglas)
September 15, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from St. Francois County, case number 20SF-CC00144, with receipt number AMOEDC-8146621, in the amount of $400 Jury Demand,, filed by Casey's Marketing Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex A-State Court File, #2 Exhibit Ex. B-Civil Coversheet, #3 Exhibit Ex. C-Original Filing Form)(Teasdale, Douglas)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Webbe v Casey's Marketing Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Casey's Marketing Company
Represented By: Douglas S. Teasdale
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Charles J Webbe
Represented By: Jeremy A. Gogel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Casey's Marketing Company doing business as Casey's General Store
Represented By: Douglas S. Teasdale
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?