Edwards v. Saul
Plaintiff: Richard W. Edwards
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party: SSA Office of General Counsel
Case Number: 4:2020cv01341
Filed: September 25, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Henry Edward Autrey
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ENTRY of Appearance by Jane Rund for Defendant Andrew M. Saul. (Rund, Jane)
September 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Richard W. Edwards. Defendant Andrew M. Saul served on 9/28/2020, by serving Jeffrey Jensen, U.S. Attorney, answer due 11/27/2020. (MCB)
September 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Summons Issued as to defendant Andrew M. Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. The summons was hand delivered to USMS this date.(MCB)
September 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER (See CMO for complete details.) This case is assigned to Track: 4. Pursuant to 12(a)(3) and (4), Fed.R.Civ.P., defendant must file any motion to dismiss, motion to remand, and/or answer within sixty (60) days of service of plaintiff's complaint. Along with its answer defendant shall file a transcript of the record, in accordance with 42 U.S.C. 405(g). Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on September 25, 2020. (MCB)
September 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [#2] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall issue process or cause process to issue on the complaint. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on September 25, 2020. (MCB)
September 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT - CJA 23 by Plaintiff Richard W. Edwards. (Severs, Traci)
September 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 First MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Richard W. Edwards. (Severs, Traci)
September 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Social Security COMPLAINT Non-Jury Demand,Yes or No - Yes,, filed by Richard W. Edwards. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Original Filing Form, #3 Summons Andrew Saul, #4 Summons Jeffrey Jensen, #5 Summons William Barr)(Severs, Traci)
September 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Case Opening Notification: Judge Assigned: Honorable Henry E. Autrey. (MFG)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Edwards v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard W. Edwards
Represented By: Traci L. Severs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Represented By: Jane Rund
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SSA Office of General Counsel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?