Atwood v. Saul
Plaintiff: Dustin E. Atwood
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party: SSA Office of General Counsel
Case Number: 4:2020cv01394
Filed: September 29, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: John A Ross
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 7, 2020 Filing 8 ENTRY of Appearance by Jane Rund for Defendant Andrew M. Saul. (Rund, Jane)
October 5, 2020 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Dustin E. Atwood. Defendant Andrew M. Saul served on 10/1/2020, answer due 11/30/2020. (JAB)
September 30, 2020 Summons Issued as to defendant Andrew M. Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. The summons was hand delivered to USMS. (JAB)
September 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the following provisions apply in this case, and will be modified only upon a showing of exceptional circumstances: This case is assigned to Track: 4. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 9/29/20. (JAB)
September 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [#2 ] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall issue process or cause process to issue on the complaint. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 9/29/20. (JAB)
September 29, 2020 Filing 4 REASSIGNMENT ORDER (GJL). DThe above styled and numbered case was opened on September 29, 2020. Due to a clerical error, this case was assigned to the Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr, United States District Judge and must be reassigned. Accordingly, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the above-styled cause is randomly reassigned to the Honorable John A. Ross, United States District Judge. Dated this 29th Day of September 2020 (MFG)
September 29, 2020 Filing 3 FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT - CJA 23 by Plaintiff Dustin E. Atwood. (MFG)
September 29, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis 4:20-cv-1394 by Plaintiff Dustin E. Atwood. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Koch, Frank)
September 29, 2020 Filing 1 Social Security COMPLAINT 4:20-cv-1394 Non-Jury Demand,Yes or No - Yes,, filed by Dustin E. Atwood. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Original Filing Form, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons)(Koch, Frank)
September 29, 2020 Case Opening Notification: Judge Assigned: Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh Jr.. (MFG)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Atwood v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dustin E. Atwood
Represented By: Frank T. Koch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Represented By: Jane Rund
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SSA Office of General Counsel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?