Cassidy v. Acme Constructors, Inc.
| Kathy Cassidy |
| Acme Constructors, Inc. |
| 4:2020cv01411 |
| October 1, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Rodney W Sippel |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NOTICE Rule 26 Initial Disclosures: by Plaintiff Kathy Cassidy (Kaplan, Lawrence) |
Filing 10
RULE 16 ORDER: This case is assigned to Track: 2. Joint Scheduling Plan due by 12/11/2020. Rule 16 Conference set for 12/18/2020 11:30 AM in Telephone Conference in Chambers before District Judge Rodney W. Sippel. [SEE ORDER FOR FULL DETAILS] Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 10/27/2020. (KEK)
|
| Filing 9 Defendant Acme Constructors' ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Acme Constructors, Inc..(Whittingham, Larissa) |
| Filing 8 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant Acme Constructors, Inc... (Whittingham, Larissa) |
| Filing 7 ENTRY of Appearance by Larissa M. Whittingham for Defendant Acme Constructors, Inc.. (Whittingham, Larissa) |
| Filing 6 ENTRY of Appearance by Julia Todd Farrell for Defendant Acme Constructors, Inc.. (Farrell, Julia) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Kathy Cassidy. Acme Constructors, Inc. served on 10/2/2020, answer due 10/23/2020. (Kaplan, Lawrence) |
| Filing 4 CJRA ORDER (GJL). Magistrate Judge Stephen R. Welby termed. Case reassigned to District Judge Rodney W. Sippel for all further proceedings. (KXS) |
| Filing 3 SUPPLEMENTAL Original Filing Form by Plaintiff Kathy Cassidy. (MFG) |
| Case Opening Notification: 1 Summons(es) issued. The summons was emailed to Lawrence P. Kaplan. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Judge Assigned: Honorable Stephen R. Welby. (MFG) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiff Kathy Cassidy Process Server: Jack Eisen (Kaplan, Lawrence) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant Acme Constructors, Inc. with receipt number AMOEDC-8185384, in the amount of $400 Jury Demand,, filed by Kathy Cassidy. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Charge of Discrimination, #2 Exhibit B-Amended Charge, #3 Exhibit C-Notice of Right to Sue, #4 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Summons Summons)(Kaplan, Lawrence) (Attachment 4 replaced on 10/2/2020) (MFG). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cassidy v. Acme Constructors, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kathy Cassidy | |
| Represented By: | Lawrence P. Kaplan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Acme Constructors, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Julia Todd Farrell |
| Represented By: | Larissa M. Whittingham |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
