Blake v. Consumer Collection Management, Inc. et al
| Crystal Blake |
| John Does 1-25 and Consumer Collection Management, Inc. |
| 4:2020cv01412 |
| October 1, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Stephen N Limbaugh |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 11/18/20. (MRS) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Crystal Blake (Saks, Yaakov) |
| Case Opening Notification: 1 Summons(es) issued. The summons was emailed to Stein Saks. All non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate # (moed-0001.pdf). Judge Assigned: Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh Jr.. (MFG) |
| Filing 3 DECLARATION filed by Plaintiff Crystal Blake re #1 Complaint, Original Filing Form. (Saks, Yaakov) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE by Plaintiff Crystal Blake re #1 Complaint, of Intent to Use Process Server (Saks, Yaakov) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant Consumer Collection Management, Inc., John Does 1-25 with receipt number AMOEDC-8185874, in the amount of $400 Jury Demand,, filed by Crystal Blake. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons proposed)(Saks, Yaakov) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
