Lindell v. Saul
Edwin T Lindell, III and Edwin T. Lindell, III |
Social Security Administration and Andrew M. Saul |
SSA Office of General Counsel |
4:2020cv01431 |
October 2, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Shirley Padmore Mensah |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 416 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to defendant Andrew M. Saul (by serving U S Attorney General) on 10/21/20 filed by Edwin T. Lindell, III. (EAB) |
Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to defendant Andrew M. Saul (by serving Office of Chief Regional Counsel) on 10/19/20 filed by Edwin T. Lindell, III. (EAB) |
Filing 10 FULL CONSENT has been received by Plaintiff Edwin T. Lindell, III, Defendant Andrew M. Saul. (EAB) |
Notice from Clerk instructing Plaintiff Edwin T. Lindell, III to submit Notice regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Notice re: Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction due by 11/9/2020. (AAT) |
Filing 8 ENTRY of Appearance by Nicholas P. Llewellyn for Defendant Andrew M. Saul. (Llewellyn, Nicholas) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Edwin T. Lindell, III. Defendant Andrew M. Saul served on 10/14/2020, answer due 12/14/2020. (EAB) |
Filing 7 Summons Issued as to defendant Andrew M. Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. The summons was hand delivered to USMS this date. (MCB) |
Filing 6 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER (See Order for complete details.) This case is assigned to Track: 4. This case has been randomly assigned to a United States Magistrate Judge. The parties have twenty-one (21) days from their entry of appearance to file their Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction forms.Pursuant to 12(a)(3) and (4), Fed.R.Civ.P., defendant must file any motion to dismiss, motion to remand, and/or answer within sixty (60) days of service of plaintiff's complaint. Along with its answer defendant shall file a transcript of the record, in accordance with 42 U.S.C. 405(g). Signed by Magistrate Judge Shirley Padmore Mensah on October 13, 2020. (MCB) |
Filing 5 ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [#2] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall issue process or cause process to issue on the complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shirley Padmore Mensah on October 13, 2020. (MCB) |
Filing 4 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (FLJ) |
Case Opening Notification: All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Judge Assigned: Honorable Shirley P. Mensah. (MFG) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Edwin T. Lindell, III. (MFG) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Edwin T Lindell, III. (Attachments: #1 application to proceed IFP)(Ferry, Michael) (Attachment 1 replaced on 10/7/2020) (MCB). |
Filing 1 Social Security COMPLAINT Non-Jury Demand,Yes or No - Yes,, filed by Edwin T Lindell, III. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Barr, #3 Summons Jensen, #4 Summons Regional, #5 Original Filing Form)(Ferry, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.