Bolden v. Glass
| Joshua Bolden |
| Kimberly M. Gardner and Dale Glass |
| 4:2020cv01445 |
| October 6, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Stephen R Clark |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 PRO SE MOTION for Bond, House Arrest, or GPS Request by Petitioner Joshua Bolden. (CLO) |
| Filing 12 SUPPLEMENTAL re #1 PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS UNDER 28 U.S.C. 2241 by Petitioner Joshua Bolden. (JAB) |
Filing 10
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. 2241. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will not issue a certificate of appealability. Signed by District Judge Stephen R. Clark on 11/20/20. (JAB)
|
|
Filing 9
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Accordingly, the Court grants #3 Petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court denies #1 Petitioner's application for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 without prejudice. The Court denies #4 Petitioners motion to compel release from confinement. The Court denies #8 Petitioners motion for sanctions, or alternatively motion for default judgment. A separate Order of Dismissal will be entered. The Court further orders that it will not issue a certificate of appealability. Signed by District Judge Stephen R. Clark on 11/20/20. (JAB)
|
|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 9, 10. Mailed to party not set-up for electronic notification Fri Nov 20 16:34:11 CST 2020 (Bernsen, John)
|
| Filing 11 PRO SE MOTION Accommodations by Petitioner Joshua Bolden. (CLO) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Sanctions by Petitioner Joshua Bolden. (JAB) |
| Filing 7 MEMORANDUM by Petitioner Joshua Bolden. (JAB) |
| Filing 6 Judge Clark enters a Standing Order in all of his cases as follows: See Order for details #https://www.moed.uscourts.gov/judge/stephen-r-clark (JAB) (JAB). |
|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 6. Mailed to party not set up for electronic notification Thu Nov 5 14:38:24 CST 2020 (Bernsen, John)
|
| Filing 5 MEMORANDUM by Petitioner Joshua Bolden. (KXS) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Compel for Dismissal by Petitioner Joshua Bolden. (JAB) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Joshua Bolden. (SMM) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to mail petitioner a copy of the Court's motion to proceed in forma pauperis habeas cases. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner must either pay the $5 filing fee or submit a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall substitute the name of the respondent to Dale Glass. Signed by District Judge Stephen R. Clark on 10/13/2020. (CLO)(Order and Motion to proceed in forma pauperis mailed to plaintiff)
|
| ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (DJO) |
| Case Opening Notification: Judge Assigned: Honorable Stephen R. Clark. (DJO) |
| ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Wed Oct 7 12:00:49 CDT 2020 (admin,) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS UNDER 28 U.S.C. 2241 by Petitioner Joshua Bolden. (Attachments: #1 Judge Assignment Label, #2 Envelope)(DJO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
