Taylor v. Atterberry et al
| Ronald Eugene Taylor |
| Elizabeth Atterberry and Anne Precythe |
| 4:2020cv01446 |
| October 6, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Rodney W Sippel |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (BAK) |
| Case Opening Notification: Judge Assigned: U.S. District Judge Rodney W. Sippel. (BAK) |
| ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Thu Oct 8 10:02:10 CDT 2020 (admin,) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Ronald Eugene Taylor. (BAK) |
| Filing 4 Certified Inmate Account Statement by Plaintiff Ronald Eugene Taylor. (BAK) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis under 42:1983 (prisoner) by Plaintiff Ronald Eugene Taylor. (BAK) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CORRESPONDENCE by Plaintiff Ronald Eugene Taylor. (BAK) |
| Filing 1 DCM PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against defendant All Defendants, filed by Ronald Eugene Taylor. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Original Filing Form, #3 Exhibit, #4 Envelope)(BAK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
