Burgess v. Precythe
Plaintiff: William Burgess
Defendant: Anne L. Precythe
Case Number: 4:2020cv01455
Filed: October 7, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: John M Bodenhausen
Referring Judge: Matthew T Schelp
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 16, 2020 Opinion or Order ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 9. Mon Nov 16 11:02:12 CST 2020 (Petri, Alexis)
November 13, 2020 Opinion or Order ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 9. Fri Nov 13 08:14:04 CST 2020 (Petri, Alexis)
November 12, 2020 Filing 9 CJRA ORDER (GJL). Magistrate Judge John M. Bodenhausen termed. Case reassigned to District Judge Matthew T. Schelp for all further proceedings (ANP) (Main Document 9 replaced on 11/16/2020) (ANP).
November 12, 2020 Filing 8 SUPPLEMENTAL by Plaintiff William Burgess. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Declaration and Exhibits, #2 Attachment Proposed Order)(ANP)
November 12, 2020 Filing 7 DECLARATION of Shyheim Deen El-Mu'Min filed by Plaintiff William Burgess. (ANP)
October 21, 2020 Filing 6 DECLARATION in Support of Offender, William Burgess's, Claim of Denial of Access to the Courts filed by Plaintiff William Burgess. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits)(ANP)
October 21, 2020 Filing 5 DECLARATION in Support of offender, William Burgess's, Claim of Attempt to Murder filed by Plaintiff William Burgess. (ANP)
October 9, 2020 Filing 4 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (FLJ)
October 9, 2020 ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (DJO)
October 9, 2020 Case Opening Notification: All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Judge Assigned: Honorable John M. Bodenhausen. (DJO)
October 9, 2020 ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Fri Oct 9 11:04:35 CDT 2020 (admin,)
October 7, 2020 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis under 42:1983 (prisoner) by Plaintiff William Burgess. (DJO)
October 7, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff William Burgess. (DJO)
October 7, 2020 Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT UNDER 42 U.S.C. 1983 against defendant Anne L. Precythe, filed by William Burgess. (Attachments: #1 Correspondence, #2 Constructive Legal Notice, #3 Summons, #4 Judge Assignment Label, #5 Envelope)(DJO)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Burgess v. Precythe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William Burgess
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Anne L. Precythe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?