Anderson v. SSM Healthcare Corporate Office
| Teresa Anderson |
| SSM Healthcare Corporate Office and SSM Healthcare Business, DBA SSM Health Integrated Health Technologies (IHT) |
| 4:2020cv01462 |
| October 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Sarah E Pitlyk |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 ENTRY of Appearance by Lauren A. Daming for Defendant SSM Healthcare Business, DBA SSM Health Integrated Health Technologies (IHT). (Daming, Lauren) |
| Filing 12 MOTION AND ORDER CONCERNING APPOINTMENT OF PRO BONO NEUTRAL by Plaintiff Teresa Anderson. (KEK) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Teresa Anderson. (KEK) |
| Filing 10 Plaintiff Response to Defendant's Entry of Appearance by Plaintiff Teresa Anderson (KEK) |
| Filing 9 SUPPLEMENTAL re #8 Amended Complaint, by Plaintiff Teresa Anderson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(KEK) |
| Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendant SSM Healthcare Business, DBA SSM Health Integrated Health Technologies (IHT) Amendment to #1 Complaint, filed by Teresa Anderson. Related document: #1 Complaint, filed by Teresa Anderson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(KEK) |
| Filing 7 ENTRY of Appearance by Amy L. Blaisdell for Defendant SSM Healthcare Corporate Office. (Blaisdell, Amy) |
Filing 6
ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL pursuant to 28 U.S.C.1915(e)(2)(B)... IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 2000e, et seq., for employment discrimination based on gender is DISMISSED for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that an appeal of this Order of Partial Dismissal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by District Judge Sarah E. Pitlyk on 11/6/2020. (NEP)
|
|
Filing 5
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER...IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Doc. [ #2 ]) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Appointment of Pro Bono Neutral (Doc. [ #3 ]) is DENIED without prejudice as premature. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. 2000e, et seq., for employment discrimination based on gender is DISMISSED for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e). IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall issue process or cause process to issue upon Defendant SSM Healthcare Corporation at the registered address of 120 S. Central Avenue, Clayton, Missouri 63105. An Order of Partial Dismissal shall accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge Sarah E. Pitlyk on 11/6/2020. (NEP)
|
| Summons Issued as to defendant SSM Healthcare Corporate Office. The summons was hand delivered to USMS. (NEP) |
|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 5,6. Fri Nov 6 13:27:37 CST 2020 (Phillips, Nicole)
|
| Filing 4 SEALED MEMORANDUM FOR CLERK re #1 Complaint, by Plaintiff Teresa Anderson. (KEK) |
| Filing 3 MOTION AND ORDER CONCERNING APPOINTMENT OF PRO BONO NEUTRAL by Plaintiff Teresa Anderson. (JWD) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Teresa Anderson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(JWD) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant SSM Healthcare Corporate Office, Jury Demand, filed by Teresa Anderson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Summary of SSM IHT HR Complaint, #2 EEOC Right to Sue Charging Letter, #3 Exhibit - Complaint Information Form)(JWD) |
| ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (JWD) |
| ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Fri Oct 9 16:01:22 CDT 2020 (admin,) |
| Case Opening Notification: All non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate # (moed-0001.pdf). Judge Assigned: Honorable Sarah E. Pitlyk. (JWD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
