Jackson v. Saint Charles County, Missouri
| Saint Charles County, Missouri and Kevin Jackson |
| 4:2020cv01504 |
| October 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Nannette A Baker |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
RULE 16 ORDER This case is assigned to Track: 2. Joint Scheduling Plan due by 12/22/2020. Rule 16 Conference set for 12/29/2020 11:00 AM in Zoom Video Conference before Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker. Notice re: Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction due by 12/22/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker on December 1, 2020. (MCB)
|
| Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Saint Charles County, Missouri.(O'Sullivan, Rory) |
| Filing 5 ENTRY of Appearance by Rory Patrick O'Sullivan for Defendant Saint Charles County, Missouri. (O'Sullivan, Rory) |
| Notice from Clerk instructing Plaintiff Kevin Jackson to submit Notice regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Notice re: Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction due by 11/16/2020. (AAT) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Kevin Jackson. Saint Charles County, Missouri served on 10/22/2020, answer due 11/12/2020. (Kasper, Kevin) |
| Judge Baker enters a Standing Order in all of her cases as follows: See Order for details #https://www.moed.uscourts.gov/judge/nannette-baker (MCB) |
| Filing 3 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (FLJ) |
| Case Opening Notification: 1 Summons(es) issued. The summons was emailed to Kevin J. Kasper. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Judge Assigned: Honorable Nannette A. Baker. (MFG) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiff Kevin Jackson Process Server: Wayne Polette (MFG) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant Saint Charles County, Missouri with receipt number AMOEDC-8221298, in the amount of $400 Jury Demand,, filed by Kevin Jackson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Original Filing Form Original Filing Form, #3 Summons Summons, #4 Form Notice of Intent to use Process Server)(Kasper, Kevin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jackson v. Saint Charles County, Missouri | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Saint Charles County, Missouri | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kevin Jackson | |
| Represented By: | Kevin J. Kasper |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
