Wallace v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc. et al
| Jacob W. Wallace |
| Wright Medical Technology, Inc. and Wright Medical Group, Inc. |
| 4:2020cv01512 |
| October 20, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| John M Bodenhausen |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ***REMARK ; Case transferred from Missouri Eastern has been opened in Eastern District of Arkansas as case 4:20-cv-01384, filed 11/23/2020. (DJO) |
Filing 10
ORDER OF MDL TRANSFER to: Eastern District of Arkansas. Case transferred via CM/ECF extraction. (DJO)
|
| Filing 9 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-7) REGARDING MDL NO. 2949 IN RE: PROFEMUR HIP IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION signed by John W. Nichols, Clerk of the Panel. (DJO) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties' joint motion to stay this matter pending transfer to In re: Profemur Hip Implant Products Liab. Litig., MDL No. 2949 (E.D. Ark.) [Doc. #7 ] is granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Bodenhausen on 11/18/2020. (ANP)
|
| Filing 7 Joint MOTION to Stay Joint Motion to Stay Pending Transfer to MDL 2939 by Defendants Wright Medical Group, Inc., Wright Medical Technology, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Transfer Order, #2 Exhibit B - Tag-Along, #3 Exhibit C - Notice of CTO)(Sayler, Scott) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Jacob W. Wallace. All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1 - Returns of Service)(Wolff, Alvin) |
| Filing 5 MEMORANDUM to Court RE Summonses by Plaintiff Jacob W. Wallace. (Wolff, Alvin) |
| Filing 4 Electronic Notice re: Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate Pursuant to Local Rule 2.09, every non-governmental organizational party must file a Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate within ten (10) days of the party's first pleading or entry of appearance. Please complete and file the certificate as soon as possible # (moed-0001.pdf). Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate due by 10/31/2020. (KEK) |
| Filing 3 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (FLJ) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE Intent to Use Special Process Server: by Plaintiff Jacob W Wallace (Wolff, Alvin) (Main Document 2 replaced on 10/20/2020) (MFG). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Jacob Wallace against defendant All Defendants with receipt number AMOEDC-8226638, in the amount of $400 Jury Demand,, filed by Jacob W Wallace. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Original Filing Form Original Filing Form, #3 Summons Summons, #4 Summons Summons)(Wolff, Alvin) |
| Case Opening Notification: 2 Summons(es) issued. The summons was emailed to Alvin Wolff. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. and all non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate # (moed-0001.pdf). Judge Assigned: Honorable John M. Bodenhausen. (MFG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
