Wood v. Saul
Plaintiff: Kacie Jobeth Wood
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party: SSA Office of General Counsel
Case Number: 4:2020cv01560
Filed: October 30, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: John M Bodenhausen
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 8, 2020 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Kacie Jobeth Wood. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Served Atty General 11/9/2020)(Overton, Kathleen)
December 8, 2020 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Kacie Jobeth Wood. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Served ORC 11/9/20)(Overton, Kathleen)
December 8, 2020 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Kacie Jobeth Wood. Defendant Andrew M. Saul served on 11/6/2020, answer due 1/5/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit served US Atty 11/6/2020)(Overton, Kathleen)
November 12, 2020 Filing 5 FULL CONSENT has been received by Defendant Andrew M. Saul, Plaintiff Kacie Jobeth Wood. (ARL)
November 12, 2020 Filing 4 ENTRY of Appearance by Nicholas P. Llewellyn for Defendant Andrew M. Saul. (Llewellyn, Nicholas)
November 2, 2020 Filing 3 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (FLJ)
November 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: This case is assigned to Track: 4. SEE ORDER FOR FULL DETAILS. Signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Bodenhausen on 11/02/2020. (ANP)
November 2, 2020 Case Opening Notification: 3 Summons(es) issued. The summons was emailed to Kathleen E. Overton. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Judge Assigned: Honorable John M. Bodenhausen. (MFG)
October 30, 2020 Filing 1 Social Security COMPLAINT with receipt number AMOEDC-8251564, in the amount of $400 Non-Jury Demand,Yes or No - No,, filed by Kacie Jobeth Wood. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Original Filing Form, #3 Summons Atty General, #4 Summons OGC, #5 Summons US Atty)(Overton, Kathleen)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wood v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kacie Jobeth Wood
Represented By: Kathleen E. Overton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Represented By: Nicholas P. Llewellyn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SSA Office of General Counsel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?