Research Verified, LLC et al v. 18 Nutrition, Inc. et al
| Research Verified, LLC and Approved Science, LLC |
| Victor Kudryavtsev, Beauty Blast, Inc., Iurii Korolov, 18 Nutrition, Inc. and Media Refined, Inc, |
| 4:2020cv01584 |
| November 6, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Nannette A Baker |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 44 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 ENTRY of Appearance by Paul Lester Schmitz for Plaintiffs Approved Science, LLC, Research Verified, LLC. (Schmitz, Paul) |
| Notice from Clerk instructing Plaintiffs Approved Science, LLC, Research Verified, LLC to submit Notice regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Notice re: Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction due by 12/14/2020. (AAT) |
| Filing 8 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (FLJ) |
| Filing 7 REPORT to Commissioner of filing or determination of an action regarding trademark. (MFG) |
| Case Opening Notification: 5 Summons(es) issued. The summons was emailed to Richard B. Blanke, Esq.. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. and all non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate # (moed-0001.pdf). Judge Assigned: Honorable Nannette A. Baker. (MFG) |
| Judge Baker enters a Standing Order in all of her cases as follows: See Order for details #https://www.moed.uscourts.gov/judge/nannette-baker (EAB) |
| Filing 6 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Plaintiff Approved Science, LLC. Parent companies: None, Subsidiaries: None, Publicly held company: No,. (Blanke, Richard) |
| Filing 5 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Plaintiff Research Verified, LLC. Parent companies: None, Subsidiaries: None, Publicly held company: No,. (Blanke, Richard) |
| Filing 4 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Plaintiff Research Verified, LLC. Parent companies: None, Subsidiaries: None, Publicly held company: No,. (Blanke, Richard) |
| Filing 3 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Plaintiff Approved Science, LLC. Parent companies: None, Subsidiaries: None, Publicly held company: No,. (Blanke, Richard) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiffs Approved Science, LLC, Research Verified, LLC Process Server: Skip N Serve - Chris Demirdjian (Blanke, Richard) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant All Defendants with receipt number AMOEDC-8265417, in the amount of $400 Jury Demand,, filed by Research Verified, LLC, Approved Science, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Original Filing Form Original Filing Form, #3 Summons Summons - 18 Nutrition, Inc., #4 Summons Summons - Media Refined, Inc., #5 Summons Summons - Beauty Blast, #6 Summons Summons - Korolov, #7 Summons Summons - Kudryavtsev, #8 Exhibit Exhibit 1 to Complaint -- Screenshots)(Blanke, Richard) (Attachment 1 replaced on 11/17/2020 with Attorney signed Civil Cover Sheet.) (CBL). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
