Engel v. MODOC et al
| Joseph Michael Devon Engel |
| Corizon, ERDCC and MODOC |
| 4:2020cv01670 |
| November 23, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Abbie Crites-Leoni |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Letter from Clerk sent to pro-se prisoner re:FRAP - all procedures for filing Notice of Appeal (copy of motion to proceed IFP on appeal attached and mailed) (MRS) |
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 5. Fri Jan 15 11:25:49 CST 2021 (Schaefer, Michelle)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. See Fed.R.Civ.P.41 (b). IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that an appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on January 14, 2021. (BRP)
|
|
Filing 4
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to mail to plaintiff a copy of the Court's "Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint" form. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to mail to plaintiff a copy of the Court's motion to proceed in forma pauperis form. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff must file an amended complaint on the Court's form within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff must either pay the $400 filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that if plaintiff files a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, he must also file a certified copy of his inmate account statement for the six-month period preceding the filing of the complaint. If plaintiff fails to timely comply with this order, the Court will dismiss this action without prejudice and without further notice. (Amended/Supplemental Pleadings due by 1/7/2021.) Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 12/17/2020. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Prisoners Civil Rights Complaint, #2 Attachment IFP Motion)(TMT)
|
|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 4. Thu Dec 17 13:33:14 CST 2020 (Tillman, Tiffani)
|
| Filing 3 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (FLJ) |
| ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (DLB) |
| Case Opening Notification: All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Judge Assigned: Honorable Abbie S. Crites-Leoni. (DLB) |
| ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Wed Nov 25 16:00:54 CST 2020 (admin,) |
| Filing 2 Document construed as, MOTION to Appoint Counsel, MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis under 42:1983 (prisoner) by Plaintiff Joseph Michael Devon Engel. (DLB) |
| Filing 1 Document construed as, PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT UNDER 42 U.S.C. 1983 against defendant Corizon, ERDCC, MODOC non-Jury Demand,, filed by Joseph Michael Devon Engel. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DLB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
