Mosku v. U.S. Bank National Association
| Eno Mosku |
| U.S. Bank National Association |
| 4:2020cv01746 |
| December 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Ronnie L White |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall make an entry in the docket record reflecting the dismissal of this action with prejudice. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(l)(A)(i). Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 1/5/2021. (TMT)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Eno Mosku (Sabat, Anthony) |
| Filing 8 ENTRY of Appearance by Douglas Robert Sargent for Defendant U.S. Bank National Association. (Sargent, Douglas) |
|
Filing 7
Docket Text ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Time (ECF No. 6) is GRANTED. Defendant shall respond to the Complaint no later than January 15, 2021. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 12/16/20. (JEB)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Unopposed by Defendant U.S. Bank National Association. (Sawyer, Ryan) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant U.S. Bank National Association Sent To: Plaintiff (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal)(Sawyer, Ryan) Modified on 12/11/2020 (TMT). |
| Filing 4 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Circuit Court, City of St. Louis, filed by Eno Mosku. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4)(BAK) |
| Filing 3 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant U.S. Bank National Association.. (Sawyer, Ryan) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant U.S. Bank National Association Sent To: Plaintiff (Sawyer, Ryan) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Missouri Circuit Court 22nd Judicial Circuit, case number 2022-CC10243, with receipt number AMOEDC-8331881, in the amount of $402 Non-Jury Demand,, filed by U.S. Bank National Association. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A State Court Docket, #2 Exhibit B Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal, #3 Exhibit C Appraisal of Property, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Original Filing Form)(Sawyer, Ryan) |
| Case Opening Notification: Judge Assigned: U.S. District Judge Ronnie L. White. (BAK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mosku v. U.S. Bank National Association | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: U.S. Bank National Association | |
| Represented By: | Ryan Aaron Sawyer |
| Represented By: | Douglas Robert Sargent |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Eno Mosku | |
| Represented By: | Anthony William Sabat |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
