Plummer v. Saul
Debra Rae Plummer |
Andrew M. Saul |
SSA Office of General Counsel |
4:2020cv01811 |
December 18, 2020 |
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Matthew T Schelp |
Social Security: RSI (405(g)) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ENTRY of Appearance by Nicholas P. Llewellyn for Defendant Andrew M. Saul. (Llewellyn, Nicholas) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Debra Rae Plummer. (Billington, P.) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Debra Rae Plummer. (Billington, P.) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Debra Rae Plummer. Defendant Andrew M. Saul served on 12/21/2020, answer due 2/19/2021. (Billington, P.) |
![]() |
Filing 1 Social Security COMPLAINT for Judicial Review of Decision of the Commissioner of Social Security with receipt number AMOEDC-8355249, in the amount of $402 Non-Jury Demand,Yes or No - No,, filed by Debra Rae Plummer. (Attachments: #1 Original Filing Form, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons Summons-Andrew Saul, #4 Summons Summons-Jeffrey B. Jensen, #5 Summons Summons-Jeffrey Rosen)(Billington, P.) |
Case Opening Notification: 3 Summons(es) issued. The summons were emailed to attorney P. Daniel Billington. Judge Assigned: U.S. District Judge Matthew T. Schelp. (BAK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.