Hopple et al v. St. Francois County Missouri et al
| Robert Hopple, Stefani Rudigier and Shawn Mesey |
| Heather Smith, St. Francois County, Missouri, Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc., Daniel Bullock and Dennis Smith |
| 4:2020cv01838 |
| December 21, 2020 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Nannette A Baker |
| Rodney W Sippel |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 22 ENTRY of Appearance by Ross D. McFerron for Defendant St. Francois County, Missouri. (McFerron, Ross) |
| Filing 21 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc.. Parent companies: None, Subsidiaries: None, Publicly held company: None,. (Eckenrode, J.) |
| Filing 20 CJRA ORDER. Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker termed. Case reassigned to District Judge Rodney W. Sippel for all further proceedings. (EAB) |
| Notice from Clerk instructing Plaintiffs Robert Hopple, Shawn Mesey, Stefani Rudigier to submit Notice regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Notice re: Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction due by 1/25/2021. (EAB) |
| Filing 19 ENTRY of Appearance by Marina Leonard for Plaintiffs Robert Hopple, Shawn Mesey, Stefani Rudigier. (Leonard, Marina) |
| Filing 18 ENTRY of Appearance by Vincent A. Colianni for Plaintiffs Robert Hopple, Shawn Mesey, Stefani Rudigier. (Colianni, Vincent) |
| Filing 17 ENTRY of Appearance by Katrina A. Hudson for Plaintiffs Robert Hopple, Shawn Mesey, Stefani Rudigier. (Hudson, Katrina) |
| Filing 16 ENTRY of Appearance by Jacki J. Langum for Plaintiffs Robert Hopple, Shawn Mesey, Stefani Rudigier. (Langum, Jacki) |
| Filing 15 ENTRY of Appearance by Blake Alexander Strode for Plaintiffs Robert Hopple, Shawn Mesey, Stefani Rudigier. (Strode, Blake) |
| Filing 14 ENTRY of Appearance by Dwight Allan Vermette, Sr for Defendant Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc.. (Vermette, Dwight) |
| Filing 13 ANSWER to #1 Complaint,,, by Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc..(Eckenrode, J.) |
| Filing 12 ENTRY of Appearance by J. Thaddeus Eckenrode for Defendant Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc.. (Eckenrode, J.) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Shawn Mesey, Stefani Rudigier, Robert Hopple. Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc. served on 12/22/2020, answer due 1/12/2021. (Lewis, Corrigan) |
| Filing 10 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Shawn Mesey, Stefani Rudigier, Robert Hopple Daniel Bullock waiver signed on 12/23/2020, answer due 2/22/2021; Dennis Smith waiver signed on 12/23/2020, answer due 2/22/2021; Heather Smith waiver signed on 12/23/2020, answer due 2/22/2021; St. Francois County, Missouri waiver signed on 12/23/2020, answer due 2/22/2021. (Lewis, Corrigan) |
| Filing 9 ENTRY of Appearance by Blake Daniel Hill for Defendants Daniel Bullock, Dennis Smith, Heather Smith, St. Francois County, Missouri. (Hill, Blake) |
| Filing 8 ENTRY of Appearance by William A. Hellmich for Defendants Daniel Bullock, Dennis Smith, Heather Smith, St. Francois County, Missouri. (Hellmich, William) |
| Filing 7 ENTRY of Appearance by Michelle V. Stallings for Defendants Daniel Bullock, Dennis Smith, Heather Smith, St. Francois County, Missouri. (Stallings, Michelle) |
| Filing 6 ENTRY of Appearance by Kevin M. Carnie for Plaintiffs Robert Hopple, Shawn Mesey, Stefani Rudigier. (Carnie, Kevin) |
| Judge Baker enters a Standing Order in all of her cases as follows: See Order for details #https://www.moed.uscourts.gov/judge/nannette-baker (EAB) |
| Filing 5 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (FLJ) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiffs Robert Hopple, Shawn Mesey, Stefani Rudigier Process Server: Always Available Services LLC (BAK) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiffs Robert Hopple, Shawn Mesey, Stefani Rudigier Process Server: Always Available Services LLC (BAK) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiffs Robert Hopple, Shawn Mesey, Stefani Rudigier Process Server: Always Available Services LLC (BAK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant All Defendants with receipt number AMOEDC-8357309, in the amount of $402 Jury Demand,, filed by Shawn Mesey, Stefani Rudigier, Robert Hopple. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Original Filing Form, #3 Summons St. Francois County Summons, #4 Summons American Correctional Healthcare, Inc. Summons, #5 Summons Sheriff Daniel Bullock Summons, #6 Summons Jail Admin Dennis Smith Summons, #7 Summons Heather Smith LPN Summons, #8 Form Notice of Intent to Use Process Server for St. Francois County, #9 Form Daniel Bullock D Smith and H Smith Intent to Use Process Server, #10 Form Advanced Correctional Healthcare Inc Notice of Intent to Use Process Server)(Lewis, Corrigan) |
| Case Opening Notification: 5 Summons(es) issued. The summons were emailed to attorney Corrigan LeAnn Lewis. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Judge Assigned: U.S. Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker. (BAK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
