Nauss v. Charter Communications, LLC
Plaintiff: Kevin A. Nauss
Defendant: Charter Communications, LLC
Case Number: 4:2020cv01854
Filed: December 22, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Matthew T Schelp
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 12, 2021 Filing 17 Joint MOTION to Stay by Defendant Charter Communications, LLC. (Williams, R.)
February 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 Docket Text ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's fourth Motion for Extension of Time, Doc. #15 , is GRANTED. Defendant has until February 12, 2021 to file its responsive pleading. Signed by District Judge Matthew T. Schelp on 2/3/2021. (TMT)
February 2, 2021 Filing 15 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Responsive Pleading by Defendant Charter Communications, LLC. (Williams, R.)
January 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 Docket Text ORDER re #13 : Consent Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer or Responsive Pleading by Defendant Charter Communications, LLC; ORDERED GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Matthew T. Schelp on 1/28/2021. (KCD)
January 26, 2021 Filing 13 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Responsive Pleading by Defendant Charter Communications, LLC. (Williams, R.)
January 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Docket Text ORDER Re: #11 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Responsive Pleading by Defendant Charter Communications, LLC; ORDERED GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Matthew T. Schelp on 1/12/2021. (TMT)
January 11, 2021 Filing 11 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Responsive Pleading by Defendant Charter Communications, LLC. (Williams, R.)
January 5, 2021 Filing 10 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant Charter Communications, LLC.. (Williams, R.)
January 5, 2021 Filing 9 Electronic Notice re: Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate to Defendant Charter Communications, LLC. Pursuant to Local Rule 2.09, every non-governmental organizational party must file a Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate within ten (10) days of the party's first pleading or entry of appearance. Please complete and file the certificate as soon as possible # (moed-0001.pdf). (Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate due by 1/15/2021.) (TMT)
January 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Docket Text ORDER re #7 : Consent Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer or Responsive Pleading by Defendant Charter Communications, LLC; ORDERED GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Matthew T. Schelp on 01/04/2021. (KCD)
December 29, 2020 Filing 7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Responsive Pleading by Defendant Charter Communications, LLC. (Williams, R.)
December 29, 2020 Filing 6 CJRA ORDER (GJL). Magistrate Judge David D. Noce termed. Case reassigned to District Judge Matthew T. Schelp for all further proceedings (KJS)
December 28, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Charter Communications, LLC Sent To: State Court - Executed (Williams, R.)
December 23, 2020 Receipt 4644091165 in the amount of $402.00 for CIVIL FILING FEE on behalf of THOMPSON COBURN, LLC (CCAM)
December 23, 2020 Filing 4 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (FLJ)
December 23, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Charter Communications, LLC Sent To: Plaintiff (Williams, R.)
December 23, 2020 Filing 2 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Circuit Court, St. Louis County, Missouri, filed by Kevin A. Nauss.(BAK)
December 23, 2020 Case Opening Notification: All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. and all non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate # (moed-0001.pdf). Judge Assigned: U.S. Magistrate Judge David D. Noce. Defendant's counsel notified to file Notice to Plaintiff of Removal. (BAK)
December 22, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL Jury Demand,, filed by Charter Communications, LLC. (Attachments: #1 State Court file, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Original Filing Form)(BAK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nauss v. Charter Communications, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kevin A. Nauss
Represented By: James P. Krupp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Charter Communications, LLC
Represented By: R. Nelson Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?