Holden v. Saul
Lisa Marie Holden |
Andrew M. Saul |
SSA Office of General Counsel |
4:2020cv01858 |
December 23, 2020 |
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
David D Noce |
Social Security: RSI (405(g)) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 FULL CONSENT has been received by Plaintiff Lisa Marie Holden, Defendant Andrew M. Saul. (KJS) |
Filing 4 ENTRY of Appearance by Jane Rund for Defendant Andrew M. Saul. (Rund, Jane) |
Filing 3 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (FLJ) |
![]() |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant Andrew M. Saul with receipt number AMOEDC-8363025, in the amount of $402 Non-Jury Demand,, filed by Lisa Marie Holden. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Original Filing Form, #3 Summons - AG, #4 Summons - SSA, #5 Summons - US Atty)(Nelson, John) |
Case Opening Notification: 3 Summons(es) issued. The summons were emailed to attorney John R. Nelson. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Judge Assigned: U.S. Magistrate Judge David D. Noce. (BAK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.